1982
DOI: 10.2307/3114628
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Company Union Movement, 1900–1937: A Reexamination

Abstract: The fostering of worker confidence in the organization has been a major goal of big business for a century. Professor Nelson, a well-known authority on the history of human resource management, here provides a new look at company unions. His view shows that the characterization of these organizations by liberal and labor critics was not always accurate. Some company unions represented noteworthy contributions to the development of a professional approach to labor relations.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The facts are just the opposite, however. As previously noted, the number of NERPs and employees covered by representation plans was higher in 1929 than ten years earlier (Nelson, 1982). Perhaps more remarkably, even during the darkest days of the Depression in 1931-1933, relatively few companies (at least the solvent ones) disbanded their NERPs even under the pressure of extreme financial exigency and a close-to-zero probability of union organization.…”
Section: Nerps: a Mixedmentioning
confidence: 81%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The facts are just the opposite, however. As previously noted, the number of NERPs and employees covered by representation plans was higher in 1929 than ten years earlier (Nelson, 1982). Perhaps more remarkably, even during the darkest days of the Depression in 1931-1933, relatively few companies (at least the solvent ones) disbanded their NERPs even under the pressure of extreme financial exigency and a close-to-zero probability of union organization.…”
Section: Nerps: a Mixedmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Nonunion employee representation, on the other hand, quickly sprang back --from 690,000 in 1922 to 1.5 million in 1928 (Nelson, 1982). It is this period of the 1920s that is most instructive and revealing with respect to the potentialities of nonunion employee representation for it was over this decade that leading employers refined and developed the new HRM paradigm, of which employee representation was a major component.…”
Section: The Evolution Of Employee Representation: From Wwi To Tmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…8 Houser (1927), pp.15-20;Slichter (1929), p.413;Nelson (1982). 9 The basic model underlying this framework is a repeated game with non-contractable human capital developed by Kanemoto & MacLeod (1989), which is modified and extended for the purpose of historical analysis.…”
Section: Implicit Contract Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%