1996
DOI: 10.2307/1131681
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Company They Keep: Friendships and Their Developmental Significance

Abstract: Considerable evidence tells us that ¿being liked¿ and ¿being disliked¿ are related to social competence, but evidence concerning friendships and their developmental significance is relatively weak. The argument is advanced that the developmental implications of these relationships cannot be specified without distinguishing between having friends, the identity of one's friends, and friendship quality. Most commonly, children are differentiated from one another in diagnosis and research only according to whether… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

21
523
0
76

Year Published

1998
1998
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 985 publications
(620 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
(46 reference statements)
21
523
0
76
Order By: Relevance
“…With repetition, these peer interaction patterns are reinforced, forming stable modes of negotiation of emotional challenges and needs. Peer interactions in middle childhood and adolescence provide repeated opportunities to practice and shape conflict resolution skills (Hartup, 1996), which will later be applied to romantic relationships (Connolly & Goldberg, 1999).…”
Section: Theoretical Model Of Partner Violence Riskmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With repetition, these peer interaction patterns are reinforced, forming stable modes of negotiation of emotional challenges and needs. Peer interactions in middle childhood and adolescence provide repeated opportunities to practice and shape conflict resolution skills (Hartup, 1996), which will later be applied to romantic relationships (Connolly & Goldberg, 1999).…”
Section: Theoretical Model Of Partner Violence Riskmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fact that positive and negative affect are mediated by different neural circuits (see, e.g., R. Davidson, 1992 ;Gray, 1990 ) lends credence to the view that nothing about the mind requires that any given stimulus be associated with only a single affective valence. Indeed, several literatures are independently converging on the notion that positive and negative emotional responses and interpersonal interactions are only moderately correlated, are processed separately, and have distinct correlates, including research on the impact of supportive and harsh parenting , ingroup favoritism and outgroup derogation ( Brewer & Brown, 1998 ), positivity and negativity in children's relationships ( Hartup, 1996 ), and acceptance and negative reciprocity in marital couples ( Arkowitz- ).…”
Section: Conflict Ambivalence and The Modular Mindmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Much of the work on individual differences in the establishment of close friendships and peer group selection is based on the idea of proactive transactions. It appears that friendship patterns and peer networks are often the function of children with similar behavioral tendencies affiliating with one another, which may facilitate continuity in each of the individual's traits (Hartup, 1996;Kupersmidt, DeRosier, & Patterson, 1995;Rubin, Lynch, Coplan, Rose-Krasnor, & Booth, 1994). However, proactive selection of peers might also function to discourage continuity of traits.…”
Section: Influences On Continuitymentioning
confidence: 99%