The Community Story, Relationality and Process: Bridging Tools for Researching Local Knowledge in a Peri‐urban Township

Abstract

In intervening in social challenges impacting local communities, Western forms of dispute/conflict resolution have been critiqued for imparting norms, values and practices that marginalise worldviews of indigenous people. From a decolonizing stance, indigenous scholars have emphasised the need for recovery of ‘lost’ values, beliefs and practices to advance indigenous knowledge. We highlight some of the conceptual challenges associated with applying ‘indigenous knowledge’ and culture‐specific ‘indigenous methodologies’ to a marginalised peri‐urban, ethnically plural township community situated on the outskirts of Johannesburg, South Africa. In embracing the mutuality of indigenous and Western knowledge forms, we explore three elements: the community story, relationality and process in relation to initial engagements with our study community. We attempt to transcend the dualism between ‘Western’ epistemologies and ‘indigenous knowledge’ through these ‘bridging concepts’. What is offered is not a formula or model but an orientation that aims to foster mutual learning through collaborative partnerships within and between communities and researchers with a view to inspiring possibilities for creative and meaningful solutions for violence prevention and dispute/conflict resolution. Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Notes on decolonizing psychology: from one Special Issue to another

“…Although we did not receive submissions in this category from (South) African settings, the prominence of the indigenous resistance approach among submissions to the STS mirrors its prominence in discussions about decolonization in (South) African contexts. It is not our place to review those discussions here (see Lau & Seedat, 2015;Long, 2016;Nwoye, 2015;Ratele, 2017), except to note that they illuminate many of the same strengths and weaknesses of the indigenous resistance approach that we observed among submissions to the STS.…”

Wewowo Local Wisdom in Realizing the Process Sustainable Development

“…In Putnam and Fukuyama's theory, these two figures provide a consistent definition of social capital. According to Putnam (1992) and Lau & Seedat (2015), social capital is "the belief that there is value in the social cooperation of individuals as members of society to lead communities for the common good in communities involving networks and social norms." In the same spirit (Fukuyama, 1999;Nonini, 2014), social capital is everything that can unite society in achieving goals based on common interests based on existing values and norms adhered to.…”

The Im(Possibilities) of Freirean Dialogue: Contested Moments of Critical Pedagogy

“…While the general principals of the story circle has roots in the critical pedagogical practices of Paulo Freire as well as Indigenous, African American and Latino activists and their Anglo allies (Curthoys, Cuthbertson, & Clark, 2012;Lau & Seedat, 2015, Rodriguez, 2015, this paper draws from the story circle's specific routes as developed and implemented by John O'Neal, a New Orleans based civil rights activist and founding member of the Free Southern Theater (FST) which was founded in the 1960's as a cultural arm of the civil rights movement in the black belt south (Randels, 2005, O'Neal, O'Neal, Hoffman, & Rao, 2006Randels, 2005). According to Randels (2005), the story circle protocol developed out of the Free Southern Theaters desire for a more democratic process of discourse that included all voices.…”