2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.schres.2015.10.034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Community Assessment of Psychic Experiences measures nine clusters of psychosis-like experiences: A validation of the German version of the CAPE

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
67
1
5

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(80 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
4
67
1
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Although both factorial structures were found to be valid, the nine dimensions factorial structure was found to fit the data best. Interestingly, this pattern of results is similar to the CFA study of the CAPE in the German sample (Schlier et al, 2015).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Although both factorial structures were found to be valid, the nine dimensions factorial structure was found to fit the data best. Interestingly, this pattern of results is similar to the CFA study of the CAPE in the German sample (Schlier et al, 2015).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Mark and Toulopoulou (2015) argued that the most plausible explanation for the inconsistent factorial structure across studies is the differing countries and/or languages. For example, in the original validation study in Greece the optimal factorial structure of the Greek version of the CAPE is the three correlated factor structure consisting of positive, negative and depressive symptoms dimensions (Stefanis et al, 2002), but in a study in Germany the most optimal factorial structure of the German version of the CAPE was a hierarchical nine dimensional factor structure consisting of a higher order of positive (bizarre experiences, hallucinations, paranoia, magical thinking, grandiosity), negative (social withdrawal, affective flattening, avolition experiences) and depressive symptoms factors (Schlier, Jaya, Moritz, & Lincoln, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The measure has demonstrated good psychometric properties in both clinical and nonclinical samples (Thewissen, Bentall, Lecomte, van Os, & Myin‐Germeys, ; Yung et al, ). In this study, only the subscale items relating to paranoia (five items, e.g., “feeling persecuted” and “conspiracy against you”) and hearing voices (two items, “hearing voices” and “voices talking to each other”) were used (Schlier, Jaya, Moritz, & Lincoln, ). The Community Assessment of Psychotic Experiences has good reliability and validity and has been cross‐validated showing to highly correlate with interview‐based assessments of psychosis (Konings, Bak, Hanssen, van Os, & Krabbendam, ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Participants were asked to rate symptom frequency during the past four weeks on a four-point Likert scale (1 = never to 4 = nearly always). The multidimensional model of the CAPE was used because it has been shown to have better factorial validity than the original three-dimensional model (Schlier, Jaya, Moritz, & Lincoln, 2015). Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) showed that bizarre experiences, hallucinations, paranoia, grandiosity, and magical thinking load into a positive symptom factor, while social withdrawal, affective flattening, and avolition load into a negative symptom factor (Schlier et al, 2015).…”
Section: Symptommentioning
confidence: 99%