2005
DOI: 10.1080/13523270500055348
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The communist successor parties of eastern and central europe and european integration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, there have already been several phases of research on ECE Social Democrats in correspondence with the main issues of their development at a certain time. Scholars focused on the challenges for social democracy in the region during the first decade of the post -communist transformation (Coppieters, Deschouwer, Waller 1994;Cook, Orenstein and Rueschemeyer 1999;Dauderstädt 1999;Gerrits 2002), on the communist successor parties that rebranded themselves as the representatives of the democratic left (Orenstein 1998;Bozóki and Ishiyama 2002;Grzymala -Busse 2002;Curry and Urban 2003;Dauderstädt 2005), and on relations between Social Democrats in the region and the broader family of this political ideology (Hough, Paterson and James 2006;Hloušek and Kopeček 2010;Holmes and Lightfoot 2011;Cabada, Hloušek and Jurek 2014). Most recently, studies of ECE social democratic parties concentrate on their decline that has become particularly acute since the global financial crisis in 2008 (De Waele and Soare 2011;Vachudova 2015;Ágh 2018;Grzymala -Busse 2019).…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, there have already been several phases of research on ECE Social Democrats in correspondence with the main issues of their development at a certain time. Scholars focused on the challenges for social democracy in the region during the first decade of the post -communist transformation (Coppieters, Deschouwer, Waller 1994;Cook, Orenstein and Rueschemeyer 1999;Dauderstädt 1999;Gerrits 2002), on the communist successor parties that rebranded themselves as the representatives of the democratic left (Orenstein 1998;Bozóki and Ishiyama 2002;Grzymala -Busse 2002;Curry and Urban 2003;Dauderstädt 2005), and on relations between Social Democrats in the region and the broader family of this political ideology (Hough, Paterson and James 2006;Hloušek and Kopeček 2010;Holmes and Lightfoot 2011;Cabada, Hloušek and Jurek 2014). Most recently, studies of ECE social democratic parties concentrate on their decline that has become particularly acute since the global financial crisis in 2008 (De Waele and Soare 2011;Vachudova 2015;Ágh 2018;Grzymala -Busse 2019).…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ponadto, czechosłowackie społeczeństwo tego czasu, z wyjątkiem małej grupy dysydentów, nie oczekiwało znaczących zmian politycznych, nawet kilka tygodni przed "Aksamitną rewolucją". Dlatego zastój w szeregach KSČS spowodował niechęć partii bronić swoją hegemonistyczną pozycję, choć, co prawda, stał się warunkiem magistralną przesłanką jej niereformowania i zachowania w przyszłości (w szczególności kluczowym następcą -KSČM) jej komunistycznej retoryki i ideologii, członkostwa i struktury organizacyjnej 18 .…”
Section: Skrajnie Lewicowe Partie Polityczne Ich Pochodzenie Ideologi...unclassified
“…The KSČ M remained communist not only in name but also in many other respects such as party membership and programmatic orientation. 19 No post-communist political system in the current EU-27 includes a party similar to the KSČ M. There are some relevant similarities between the KSČ M and the Party of Democratic Socialism (PDS) in Germany (including populism), but major differences exist in terms of electoral results and the geographic distribution of the electorate, with an uneven distribution in the case of the PDS 20 and a relatively even distribution for the KSČ M (see Table 3). Comparison with the closest political systems in the region, Poland and Hungary, highlights even more significant differences.…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%