2010
DOI: 10.2190/tw.41.1.c
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Communication Habits of Engineers: A Study of How Compositional Style and Time Affect the Production of Oral and Written Communication of Engineers

Abstract: Writing is common skill for many whose job requires them to communicate through business documents. But there are many professionals who seemingly have difficulty with writing. Many engineers are required to write proposals and reports yet have received little formal writing instruction. The purpose of this study was to determine if writing apprehension, their composition process, or the presence of deadlines affects the production of documents. The hypothesis was that engineers have high writing apprehension,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Conciseness The most frequently mentioned trait was to use as few words as possible for the intended message (Aller, 2002;Nicometo, Anderson, Nathans-Kelly, Courter, & McGlamery, 2010;Norback, Leeds, & Forehand, 2009;Sales, 2006). However, in a transportation firm, Steiner (2011) found "little focus on conciseness" and instead an emphasis on accurate technical information "which is most often not enhanced by brevity" (p. 45).…”
Section: Practitioner Descriptions Of Effective Writingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Conciseness The most frequently mentioned trait was to use as few words as possible for the intended message (Aller, 2002;Nicometo, Anderson, Nathans-Kelly, Courter, & McGlamery, 2010;Norback, Leeds, & Forehand, 2009;Sales, 2006). However, in a transportation firm, Steiner (2011) found "little focus on conciseness" and instead an emphasis on accurate technical information "which is most often not enhanced by brevity" (p. 45).…”
Section: Practitioner Descriptions Of Effective Writingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multiple studies also found that practitioners valued careful choices of words and phrases for accurate, unambiguous content (Aller, 2002;Sales, 2006;Steiner, 2011). Rhoulac and Crenshaw (2006) found that an industry representative from civil engineering was more critical of syntax and grammar than was a faculty member, and Norback et al (2009) found that executives from across fields of engineering emphasized correct grammar and spelling.…”
Section: Accurate Word Choicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…34–37). Semistructured interviews rely on open-ended, nondirective questions intended to solicit information that the researcher may not have known about in advance (Steiner, 2011, p. 37). I did not start out with existing data or theories to expand on, because the professional communication practices of indie rock musicians have been little studied and may be different those of other extra-institutional groups.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies have shown that engineers on the job appreciate and seek out peer review and constructive feedback on their writing (Steiner, 2011), and that they find writing engaging when they "know their texts will be acted upon by others in the development of the design," or, in other words, when engineers write for real, active audiences (Sales, 2009, p. 90). Winsor's 1996 book, Writing Like an Engineer: A Rhetorical Education, advocates for an adjustment in the way that workplace writing courses teach audience by highlighting the ways in which engineers see writing as a social activity, a perspective echoed in the requirements from the Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET).…”
Section: Conclusion and Recommendationsmentioning
confidence: 99%