1983
DOI: 10.1080/00913367.1983.10672846
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Communication Effects of Controversial Sexual Content in Television Programs and Commercials

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
69
0
3

Year Published

1992
1992
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 130 publications
(73 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
69
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, Scott and Goff (1988) found that subjects who watched an exciting program immediately prior to a newscast recalled less of the news stories than did viewers who watched a program containing unexciting material. Most researchers posit that the interruption of highly engaging programs frustrates viewers and consequently disrupts their information processing of peripheral stimuli (Bello, Pitts, & Etzel, 1983;Kennedy, 1971). The Intensity perspective emphasizes arousal induced by the program.…”
Section: The Effects Of the Intensity Of Mood States On Processing Inmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Scott and Goff (1988) found that subjects who watched an exciting program immediately prior to a newscast recalled less of the news stories than did viewers who watched a program containing unexciting material. Most researchers posit that the interruption of highly engaging programs frustrates viewers and consequently disrupts their information processing of peripheral stimuli (Bello, Pitts, & Etzel, 1983;Kennedy, 1971). The Intensity perspective emphasizes arousal induced by the program.…”
Section: The Effects Of the Intensity Of Mood States On Processing Inmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the case of television advertising, a start has been made at investigating the effects of surrounding program material on the effectiveness of the embedded advertisements. Among the aspects of program context that have been found to influence advertisement effectiveness are the following: program genre (Schwerin 1958;Schwerin and Newell 1981), program-induced viewer mood (Axelrod 1963;Goldberg and Gorn 1987;Kamins, Marks and Skinner 1991), programadvertisement congruity (Bello, Pitts and Etzel 1983;Hansen, Barry, Reed and McGill 1976;Horn and McEwan 1977;Johnson 1981;Kamins, Marks and Skinner 1991;Lambert 1980;Murphy, Cunningham and Wilcox 1978), program-induced viewer excitement (Singh, Churchill and Hitchon 1987), and program-induced viewer involvement (Bryant and Comisky 1978;Clancy and Kweskin 1971;Kennedy 1971;Krugman 1983;Leach 1981;Menneer 1987;Siebert 1978;Soldow and Principe, 1981;Television Audience Assessment 1984;Thorson, Reeves and Schleuder 1985). The findings that have been reported to date tend to suggest that the most important context variable, as far as advertisement effectiveness is concerned, is programinduced viewer involvement.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sex appeal is more engaging, involving, interesting, entertaining, attention grabbing, favourable and original than non-sexual ads (Bello, Pitts, & Etzel, 1983;Dudeley, 1999;Jude & Alexander, 1983;Severn et al, 1990;Reichert & Alvaro, 2001;Reichert, Heckler, & Jackson, 2001). Sexual stimuli had led to increased attention and recognition which was validated with empirical evidences by various researchers (Vezina & Paul, 1997;Chestnut, LaChance, & Lubitz, 1977;Reid & Soley, 1981De Pelsmacker & Geuens, 1998;Tissier-Desbordes & Manceau, 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 73%