2020
DOI: 10.1121/10.0001400
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The common murre (Uria aalge), an auk seabird, reacts to underwater sound

Abstract: The effect of two 12 kHz multibeam mapping surveys on the foraging behavior of Cuvier's beaked whales off of southern California

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, about 1 in 6 of all vessel transits, or 16%, were identified as being ‘noisy’. Although our classification of vessels in this category was a subjective one, this preliminary result is worth consideration given that noise is a specific component of vessel disturbance in aquatic systems [ 45 ], and marine birds may respond to noise as a disturbance [ 35 , 36 , 46 ]. While effects of vessel noise alone has so far not been well studied in the context of waterbird responses [ 3 ], it has been explicitly described as a supposed component of overall vessel disturbance effects (e.g., [ 7 , 47 , 48 ]).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In contrast, about 1 in 6 of all vessel transits, or 16%, were identified as being ‘noisy’. Although our classification of vessels in this category was a subjective one, this preliminary result is worth consideration given that noise is a specific component of vessel disturbance in aquatic systems [ 45 ], and marine birds may respond to noise as a disturbance [ 35 , 36 , 46 ]. While effects of vessel noise alone has so far not been well studied in the context of waterbird responses [ 3 ], it has been explicitly described as a supposed component of overall vessel disturbance effects (e.g., [ 7 , 47 , 48 ]).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We identified vessels as noisy based on apparent in-air noise, but some vessels will contribute to both in-air and underwater noise (with the latter unmeasured by us in this study). Effects of underwater noise on birds are perhaps even more poorly understood than are those of in-air noise [ 46 , 49 ], but are likely have both direct and indirect consequences.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The rise in ambient noise is a growing concern due to the adverse effects on marine life, in particular on marine mammals (Southall et al, 2008(Southall et al, , 2019Richardson et al, 2013), invertebrates (Murchy et al, 2019), fishes (Slabbekoorn et al, 2010;Popper et al, 2014;Cox et al, 2018) and birds (Anderson Hansen et al, 2020). Impacts are pervasive and affect individual animals as well as populations (Pirotta et al, 2018;Soudijn et al, 2020), at all taxonomic and trophic levels.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent studies have investigated the impacts of anthropogenic noise on a wide range of taxa and across a variety of scales (Barber et al, 2009; Morley et al, 2014; Normandeau Associates, 2012; Slabbekoorn et al, 2010; Thomsen et al, 2021; Tyack, 2008). Anthropogenic noiseee can cause a range of physical, physiological, and behavioural disorders in aquatic organisms, including marine mammals (Erbe et al, 2018; Moore et al, 2012; Southall et al, 2008), seabirds (Bermúdez-Cuamatzin et al, 2018; Green et al, 2016; Hansen et al, 2020), reptiles (Injaian et al, 2020; Simmons and Narins, 2018), fish (Hastings and Popper, 2005; Hawkins, 1986; Mills et al, 2020; Popper et al, 2003), and invertebrates (Carroll et al, 2017; Coquereau et al, 2016; Murchy et al, 2019). Because of the high propagation rate and low attenuation over large distances in underwater environments, acoustic stimuli play an important role in aquatic environments (Tyack, 1998; Popper and Hastings, 2009; Slabbekoorn et al, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%