2018
DOI: 10.1167/iovs.18-23881
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The CommonABCA4Variant p.Asn1868Ile Shows Nonpenetrance and Variable Expression of Stargardt Disease When Present intransWith Severe Variants

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
123
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

4
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(125 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
(35 reference statements)
2
123
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A common c.5603A>T (p.Asn1868Ile) variant, strongly associated with late‐onset STGD1 (F. P. M. Cremers et al, ; Runhart et al, ; Zernant et al, ), was found in a heterozygous manner as a single variant in 144 STGD1 cases. It was previously shown that p.Asn1868Ile contributes to the pathogenicity of variants c.769–784C>T and c.2588G>C, which was consistently found in cis in patients and much less frequent in healthy persons (Sangermano et al, ; Zernant et al, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A common c.5603A>T (p.Asn1868Ile) variant, strongly associated with late‐onset STGD1 (F. P. M. Cremers et al, ; Runhart et al, ; Zernant et al, ), was found in a heterozygous manner as a single variant in 144 STGD1 cases. It was previously shown that p.Asn1868Ile contributes to the pathogenicity of variants c.769–784C>T and c.2588G>C, which was consistently found in cis in patients and much less frequent in healthy persons (Sangermano et al, ; Zernant et al, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Until recently, 35% of STGD1 cases carried one or no coding or splice site mutation (Zernant et al, ). Copy‐number variations (CNVs), deep‐intronic variants (Bauwens et al, ; Bax et al, ; Braun et al, ; Zernant et al, ), and a low‐penetrant frequent coding variant (p.Asn1868Ile) (Runhart et al, ; Zernant et al, ) explained about 10% of this missing heritability. Recently, upon sequence analysis of the entire ABCA4 gene, eight novel and one known deep‐intronic variant explained approximately 65% of the remaining unsolved cases (Bauwens et al, ; Sangermano et al, ; Zernant et al, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Possible reasons for these results are as follows: (1) targeted exome sequencing and WES cannot detect gross deletions, gross insertions, or complex rearrangement variants (Broadgate, Yu, Downes, & Halford, 2017), which might have been present in these families; (2) the sequence depth and coverage in this study was insufficient to call all variants accurately; (3) novel STGD-associated genes may have been filtered out during our raw data analysis; (4) deep-intronic variants in ABCA4 that are potentially associated with autosomal recessive STGD could not be captured through targeted exome sequencing and WES (Albert et al, 2018;Bauwens et al, 2015Bauwens et al, , 2019Bax et al, 2015;Braun et al, 2013;Sangermano et al, 2014;Zernant et al, 2014); and (5) diseasecausing variants with high minor allele frequency, which had not been reported previously may have been filtered out, for example, c.5603A > T, p.(Asn1868Ile) (Cremers, Cornelis, Runhart, & Astuti, 2018;Runhart et al, 2018;Zernant et al, 2017). Possible reasons for these results are as follows: (1) targeted exome sequencing and WES cannot detect gross deletions, gross insertions, or complex rearrangement variants (Broadgate, Yu, Downes, & Halford, 2017), which might have been present in these families; (2) the sequence depth and coverage in this study was insufficient to call all variants accurately; (3) novel STGD-associated genes may have been filtered out during our raw data analysis; (4) deep-intronic variants in ABCA4 that are potentially associated with autosomal recessive STGD could not be captured through targeted exome sequencing and WES (Albert et al, 2018;Bauwens et al, 2015Bauwens et al, , 2019Bax et al, 2015;Braun et al, 2013;Sangermano et al, 2014;Zernant et al, 2014); and (5) diseasecausing variants with high minor allele frequency, which had not been reported previously may have been filtered out, for example, c.5603A > T, p.(Asn1868Ile) (Cremers, Cornelis, Runhart, & Astuti, 2018;Runhart et al, 2018;Zernant et al, 2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, we did not detect a disease-causing variant in three families (25.00%), and we detected only one heterozygous variant in the ABCA4 gene in one family (8.33%). Possible reasons for these results are as follows: (1) targeted exome sequencing and WES cannot detect gross deletions, gross insertions, or complex rearrangement variants (Broadgate, Yu, Downes, & Halford, 2017), which might have been present in these families; (2) the sequence depth and coverage in this study was insufficient to call all variants accurately; (3) novel STGD-associated genes may have been filtered out during our raw data analysis; (4) deep-intronic variants in ABCA4 that are potentially associated with autosomal recessive STGD could not be captured through targeted exome sequencing and WES (Albert et al, 2018;Bauwens et al, 2015Bauwens et al, , 2019Bax et al, 2015;Braun et al, 2013;Sangermano et al, 2014;Zernant et al, 2014); and (5) diseasecausing variants with high minor allele frequency, which had not been reported previously may have been filtered out, for example, c.5603A > T, p.(Asn1868Ile) (Cremers, Cornelis, Runhart, & Astuti, 2018;Runhart et al, 2018;Zernant et al, 2017). Whole-genome sequencing (WGS) may be a useful alternative strategy to resolve these problems (Carrigan et al, 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%