World Literature and Ecology 2020
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-38581-1_2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Commodity Frontier and Its Secret

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To this conception of world-culture we can add an understanding that the capitalist world-system is also a world-ecology . More recently, the ‘world-ecological turn’ has seen literary critics draw on the work of Jason W. Moore, in order to explore how the environmental history of capitalism and its evolution processes of frontierisation is mediated in world-literary aesthetics (Niblett, 2020) or to demonstrate how cultural production mediates ‘the fault-lines of ecology, race and gender’ and registers the ecology of women's work in relation to the socio-ecological relations that sustain capitalist accumulation (Oloff, 2016: 47). Moore formulates that the capitalist world-system is also a ‘capitalist world-ecology’, whose systemic cycles of accumulation are founded in organisational revolutions not only of social relations but also of those ‘bundles of human and biophysical natures’ that Moore labels ‘ecological regimes’ (2015: 9).…”
Section: Social Reproduction and World-culturementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To this conception of world-culture we can add an understanding that the capitalist world-system is also a world-ecology . More recently, the ‘world-ecological turn’ has seen literary critics draw on the work of Jason W. Moore, in order to explore how the environmental history of capitalism and its evolution processes of frontierisation is mediated in world-literary aesthetics (Niblett, 2020) or to demonstrate how cultural production mediates ‘the fault-lines of ecology, race and gender’ and registers the ecology of women's work in relation to the socio-ecological relations that sustain capitalist accumulation (Oloff, 2016: 47). Moore formulates that the capitalist world-system is also a ‘capitalist world-ecology’, whose systemic cycles of accumulation are founded in organisational revolutions not only of social relations but also of those ‘bundles of human and biophysical natures’ that Moore labels ‘ecological regimes’ (2015: 9).…”
Section: Social Reproduction and World-culturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…[…] Readers hunger for large stories that … offer them some sort of large-scale vision' (Palumbo-Liu et al, 2011: 9). This issue takes its cue from those materialist scholars who draw on world-systems theory to argue that world-culture is best conceptualised with regard to the capitalist world-system, and, consequently, that the concept of combined and uneven development provides fruitful avenues through which to compare the aesthetic properties of seemingly diverse cultural forms (WReC, 2015;Macdonald, 2017;Shapiro and Barnard, 2017;Deckard and Shapiro, 2019;Lawrence, 2020;Mukherjee, 2020;Niblett, 2020;Poyner, 2020;Deckard, 2021;Lazarus, 2022;Oloff, 2023;Deckard et al, 2024).…”
Section: Social Reproduction and World-culturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…[…] Cultural forms, including literary works, can be grasped as a species of social knowledge fundamentally interwoven with the reproduction of material life." 30 It's worth noting that culture is here not understood as a self-regulating and self-harmonizing "ecosystem" threatened by an exterior, externalized capitalist order, pace Hubert Zapf's notion of "cultural ecology." 31 (Indeed, the very notions of holism and ecosystem arise out of fundamentally racist evolutionary sciences that developed alongside free-market neoliberalism.)…”
Section: Experimental Writing As World-buildingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When the conceptual insights of social reproduction feminism are incorporated alongside an approach to world-literature as 'the literature of the world-system' (Warwick Research Collective, 2015: 8) and as 'the literature of the world-ecology' (Niblett, 2020:10) , our critical focus is redirected from literary representations of the struggles of waged (male) proletariats or of statist struggles in the context of decolonisation towards representations of movements arising on the terrain of social reproduction itself, but also to how waged and statist struggles themselves depend on the accompanying organisation of workers in social reproduction, whether in material provision of food and water, or the immaterial resources of nurture. While intensities and valences of literary representation vary – in some texts social reproduction is a critically conscious horizon, in others it is consigned to the political unconscious – I would argue that social reproduction ineluctably appears at the level of content.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%