The Commoditization of Country Foods in Nunavik: A Comparative Assessment of its Development, Applications, and Significance

Abstract

ABSTRACT. The article presents the historical roots of development policy vis-à-vis Canadian Inuit as it relates to the commoditization of country foods in the Canadian North, with particular reference to Nunavik. Although Inuit place an emphasis on sharing country foods, they have developed various mechanisms that allow them to be sold. Such sales are complicated for a number of reasons. Legislation at various levels of government either prohibits or severely restricts the commercial sale of country foods, particularly for an export market. Despite this, individual businesspeople, Makivik Corporation (the regional Inuit development agency), and the government-sponsored Hunter Support Program (HSP) have all, with varying degrees of success, started to commoditize country foods. The requirement to meet conservation measures and respect government processing standards has restricted the commercial development of these foods for export, which, in turn, has limited such development both by individuals and by Makivik Corporation. The HSP, which pays people to supply country foods that are then given away to beneficiaries under the James Bay and Northern Quebec Agreement, is the most accepted and successful form of commoditization. The reason for its success is twofold. First, regulations generally favour the development of a local market for country foods. Second, at an ethical level the HSP is tolerable to people because it both curbs the practice of selling country foods purely for individual self-interest and underscores sociality by replicating the Inuit tradition of sharing food with the community. Although Inuit are consumers of the commoditized country foods to some extent, the Inuit who produce those foods for sale insist that they do not sell them to other Inuit, but rather continue to share. They have made a teleological distinction between the sale of country foods to Inuit, which tradition inhibits, and the sale of country foods to institutions, which is acceptable. The latter removes country foods from the domestic sphere, thereby enabling Inuit to sell the foods without challenging the principle that they be shared.Key words: country foods, Inuit, Nunavik, Canada, economic development, commodity, Hunter Support Program, Makivik, commercialization, economy, sharing RÉSUMÉ. Dans cet article sont exposées les racines historiques de l'élaboration des politiques concernant les Inuit du Canada en ce qui a trait à la commercialisation de la nourriture traditionnelle dans le Nord canadien, en particulier au Nunavik. Bien que les Inuit mettent l'accent sur le partage de la nourriture traditionnelle, ils ont créé divers mécanismes qui leur permettent de la vendre. Ces transactions sont compliquées pour plusieurs raisons. La législation à divers paliers du gouvernement soit interdit la vente commerciale de nourriture traditionnelle, soit lui impose des restrictions très sévères, en particulier pour le marché d'exportation. Malgré cela, des gens d'affaires, la Société Makivik (l'agence de développement inuite régio...

Prevalence of food insecurity in a Greenlandic community and the importance of social, economic and environmental stressors

“…While economic factors play a similar limiting role restricting food security in Qeqertarsuaq, market foods were described as affordable relative to the purchase of Greenlandic foods with some respondents consuming greater quantities of market foods in times of economic stress. As the sale of traditional foods is uncommon within Inuit communities in Canada and generally incompatible with local cultural norms (46), traditional food access is negotiated through food sharing, trading and harvesting practices (3). Although expensive, the option of purchasing traditional foods in Greenland increases access for waged workers and others with cash income and limited harvesting ability while providing necessary cash resources for hunters.…”

Research on the Human Dimensions of Climate Change in Nunavut, Nunavik, and Nunatsiavut: A Literature Review and Gap Analysis

“…Few studies examine how these broader influences will affect vulnerability and adaptation in the eastern and central Canadian Arctic, although research from Scandinavia indicates the often limited power of local and regional governments to influence these trends (Keskitalo, 2008(Keskitalo, , 2009Keskitalo and Kulyasova, 2009). Fourth, the exchange of traditional foods for money has been noted in some projects as an adaptation to the costs of hunting and a way to provide resources for adapting to changing environmental conditions (Gombay, 2005(Gombay, , 2006Ford et al, 2009;Laidler et al, 2009). While cultural tradition disfavours the selling or buying of traditional foods, it is potentially a viable way to create economic opportunity and reinvestment for supporting traditional ways.…”

Community, obligation, and food: lessons from the moral geography of inuit

“…2 Focusing on the commoditization of food, I had been researching the evolution of the local economy of Inuit (cf. Gombay 2005). I was exploring how this economy was governed by a set of social institutions that are essentially sustained by the moral imperative to share food.…”