2010
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.16413.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Combined NVSS-FIRST Galaxies (CoNFIG) sample - II. Comparison of space densities in the Fanaroff-Riley dichotomy

Abstract: This paper focuses on a comparison of the space densities of Fanaroff-Riley type I (FR I) and FR II sources at different epochs, with a particular focus on FR I sources.First, we present the concluding steps in constructing the Combined NVSS-FIRST Galaxies (CoNFIG) catalogue, including new Very Large Array observations, optical identifications and redshift estimates. The final catalogue consists of 859 sources over four samples (CoNFIG-1, -2, -3 and -4 with flux density limits of S 1.4 GHz = 1.3, 0.8, 0.2 and … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
64
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
4
64
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We initially selected the FRI-II sample from a subset of the Combined NVSS and FIRST Galaxies sample (Gendre & Wall 2008;Gendre et al 2010) (CoNFIG henceforth). This sample of radio sources was compiled specifically to address the need and lack of samples of FRI-II sources in the literature.…”
Section: Sample Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We initially selected the FRI-II sample from a subset of the Combined NVSS and FIRST Galaxies sample (Gendre & Wall 2008;Gendre et al 2010) (CoNFIG henceforth). This sample of radio sources was compiled specifically to address the need and lack of samples of FRI-II sources in the literature.…”
Section: Sample Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since all these are samples based on visual inspection, there is a possibility of confusion in the assigned class of a source due to different studies estimating different morphologies for the same source. To resolve this issue, we have excluded all cross-matched sources from the FRI and FRII samples which have been marked as confirmed WAT/NAT, W-shaped or Ring (and Ring-lobe) morphologies in either Gendre et al (2010) or Proctor (2011). We have removed the bent-tailed radio galaxies from the FRICAT by visual inspection.…”
Section: Sample Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Toward lower radio power, contamination from the non-thermal radio continuum of vigorous starbursts becomes increasingly important. The high-redshift radio luminosity function of Willott et al (2001) and Gendre et al (2010) suggests that such galaxies are factors of 100 more common than the very powerful radio sources, with co-moving number densities on the order of a few 10 −7 Mpc −3 , sufficient to represent a short, generic phase in the evolution of massive galaxies, as we will argue below in Sect. 9.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The radio luminosity functions of Willott et al (2001) and Gendre et al (2010) suggest that galaxies with a radio power of 10 27−28 W Hz −1 have co-moving number densities of 10 −(7−6) Mpc −3 at z ∼ 2, whereas the general population of massive high-redshift galaxies have densities of a few 10 −5 Mpc −3 (e.g., Mancini et al 2009, for M stellar ≥ 10 10.5 M ). This suggests that phases of radio activity in this power range could be a generic phase in the evolution of massive galaxies at these redshifts, if the activity timescales are short enough, a few 10 7 yrs.…”
Section: A Generic Phase In the Evolution Of Massive High-redshift Gamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Type IIs are usually found in less dense environments, and strong emission lines can often be seen in their optical spectra (e.g., Zirbel 1997;Kauffmann et al 2008); type Is, on the other hand, are usually hosted by giant elliptical galaxies, and on average have weaker or no optical nuclear emission lines, which puts them on a different radio power-emission line luminosity correlation than that of FR IIs (Hine & Longair 1979;Zirbel & Baum 1995, see below). The cosmological evolution of the two types may also differ significantly (e.g., Willott et al 2001; but see Gendre et al 2010). Collectively, these differences are usually referred to as the FR I/II dichotomy, which has been the focus of numerous studies (e.g., Heckman et al 1994;Baum et al 1995;Hardcastle et al 2007;Kauffmann et al 2008;Baldi & Capetti 2010, and references therein).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%