2016
DOI: 10.5194/isprs-archives-xli-b8-953-2016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Combination of Uav Survey and Landsat Imagery for Monitoring of Crop Vigor in Precision Agriculture

Abstract: ABSTRACT:Mapping of the with-in field variability of crop vigor has a long tradition with a success rate ranging from medium to high depending on the local conditions of the study. Information about the development of agronomical relevant crop parameters, such as aboveground biomass and crop nutritional status, provides high reliability for yield estimation and recommendation for variable rate application of fertilizers. The aim of this study was to utilize unmanned and satellite multispectral imaging for esti… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
(10 reference statements)
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The overall difference in median NDVI between the average atmospherically corrected and UAV product was 0.184 in the case of Landsat 8, and 0.229 in the case of Sentinel-2 NDVI. This is a meaningful difference for many studies, and authors tend to use UAVs as ground truth data, which is especially the case of precision agriculture [52][53][54]. Considering the different range of NIR band of tested platforms, we found the shift to the shorter wavelengths of the UAV band significant, and thus, we conclude, contrary to Ryu et al [55], the differences in measured values observed at our locality limit the possibility for using UAV as a collector of ground truth NDVI values for satellites.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The overall difference in median NDVI between the average atmospherically corrected and UAV product was 0.184 in the case of Landsat 8, and 0.229 in the case of Sentinel-2 NDVI. This is a meaningful difference for many studies, and authors tend to use UAVs as ground truth data, which is especially the case of precision agriculture [52][53][54]. Considering the different range of NIR band of tested platforms, we found the shift to the shorter wavelengths of the UAV band significant, and thus, we conclude, contrary to Ryu et al [55], the differences in measured values observed at our locality limit the possibility for using UAV as a collector of ground truth NDVI values for satellites.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zarco-Tejada, González-Dugo, and Berni et al 2012focused on the calculation of fluorescence, temperature, and narrow band indices and applied these observations to the water stress detection; they also used data from a hyperspectral sensor to calculate relationships between photosynthesis and chlorophyll fluorescence (Zarco-Tejada, Catalina, González, & Martín, 2013). Lukas et al (2016) compared the basic growth parameters obtained from a fixed-wing UAV equipped with a NIR camera versus data from Landsat 8. Both platforms showed a high correlation with ground measurements of biomass and nitrogen content but the satellite data had a coarser resolution.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The utilization of unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) images using near-infrared (NIR), greenish, red, and blue multispectral images is effectively implemented in personalized agriculture for evaluating plant growth and condition [ 9 ]. Spectral indicators like the normalization differential vegetative indices (NDVI) or greenish normalization differential vegetative indices (GNDVI) could be used to evaluate crop kind, productivity, and maturing phase [ 10 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%