2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.psychres.2017.06.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale: Associations between interrupted, aborted, and actual suicide attempts among adolescent inpatients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
15
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
2
15
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Both of these by-products are responsible for their toxicity. 187 , 188 Paraphenylenediamine ingestion is another conventional means to commit suicide in southern Punjab. 189…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both of these by-products are responsible for their toxicity. 187 , 188 Paraphenylenediamine ingestion is another conventional means to commit suicide in southern Punjab. 189…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The screening for suicidal ideation and behavior is performed using the Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) [45], an internationally approved scale for the assessment of suicidality and one of the most used in clinical trials, part of the Treatment of Adolescent Suicide Attempters (TASA) study that assesses suicidal risk [46]. This scale is also used in different settings to distinguish suicidal from non-suicidal self-injurious behavior, provide definitions of these two entities, and measure the full range of suicidal behavior and suicidal ideation [46][47][48][49]. It also estimates their severity and intensity over indicated periods and defines the type and lethality of suicidal behavior [46,50], and selected items predict the risk of suicide, such as preparatory activity [50].…”
Section: Screening Of Suicidal Ideationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Three intervention studies focused on training,297 therapy298 and observation299; all reported a reduction in self-harm behaviours and a further intervention focusing on training for staff resulted in positive attitude towards self-harm patients, greater closeness and improved self-efficacy 300. Of the 17 papers that centred on suicidal behaviours, five studies investigated the observance of risk factors301–305 and three intervention studies found significant reductions in suicide-related behaviours and cognitions 306–308. An additional eight papers explored staff,309–312 patient313 314 and both staff and patient315 316 views and attitudes towards suicidal behaviour.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%