2019
DOI: 10.1017/thg.2019.50
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Colorado Twin Registry: 2019 Update

Abstract: The Colorado Twin Registry (CTR) is a population-based registry formed from birth and school records including twins born between 1968 and the present. Two previous reports on the CTR [Rhea et al., (2006). Twin Research and Human Genetics, 9, 941–949; Rhea et al., (2013).Twin Research and Human Genetics, 16, 351–357] covered developments in the CTR through 2012. This report briefly summarizes previously presented material on ascertainment and recruitment and the relationships between samples and studies, discu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

5
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Analyses were based on 1,238 individuals ( M = 33.15 years, SD = 4.96) who completed measures of EF and intelligence as part of the ongoing Colorado Longitudinal Twin study (LTS) EF-MRI (Corley et al, 2019) and CATSLife projects (Wadsworth et al, 2019). This total included 700 individuals from same-sex twin pairs from the LTS ( M = 29.33 years, SD = 1.27) and 538 individuals from the Colorado Adoption Project (CAP; M = 38.12 years, SD = 3.27), and included EF data collected for LTS EF-MRI study or CATSLife between 2014 and 2020 and intelligence data collected in CATSLife between 2015 and 2020.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Analyses were based on 1,238 individuals ( M = 33.15 years, SD = 4.96) who completed measures of EF and intelligence as part of the ongoing Colorado Longitudinal Twin study (LTS) EF-MRI (Corley et al, 2019) and CATSLife projects (Wadsworth et al, 2019). This total included 700 individuals from same-sex twin pairs from the LTS ( M = 29.33 years, SD = 1.27) and 538 individuals from the Colorado Adoption Project (CAP; M = 38.12 years, SD = 3.27), and included EF data collected for LTS EF-MRI study or CATSLife between 2014 and 2020 and intelligence data collected in CATSLife between 2015 and 2020.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Analyses were based on a total of 1,684 individuals (830 female participants, 854 male participants) from the CATSLife project (Wadsworth et al, 2019). CATSLife comprises two samples with similar measures: the Colorado Longitudinal Twin Sample (LTS; Corley et al, 2019) and the Colorado Adoption Project (CAP; Wadsworth et al, 2019). LTS participants included same-sex twin pairs (232 full monozygotic [MZ] twin pairs, 203 full dizygotic [DZ] twin pairs, and two unpaired twins) and CAP participants included 177 biological sibling pairs, 176 adoptive sibling pairs, and 106 unpaired individuals.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 2013 special issue also featured an update of the Colorado Twin Registry (CTR; Rhea, Gross et al, 2013), describing registry enrollment, sample characteristics, and several studies which contribute to and utilize the data from the CTR, including the LTS, which has served as a comparison sample to clinical samples in studies such as the CADD, and as the primary sample to studies such as the Executive Cognitive Function-LTS (ECF-LTS). The recent CTR follow-up in this special issue (Corley et al, in press) takes a more general look at the multiple samples of CTR twins and other research involving LTS. The LTS has largely followed the same testing schedule as that of the CAP and has the following main attributes: (1) prospective, longitudinal structure assessing traits from infancy into early adulthood; (2) multivariate format (with measures nearly parallel to those of the CAP) and (3) 483 twin pairs and their parents.…”
Section: The Longitudinal Twin Studymentioning
confidence: 99%