Two complementary bodies of literature either claim explicitly or imply that human cruelty is rooted in asymmetrical relationships. The first describes and analyzes various forms of domination and acquiescence, including colonialism, racism, imperialism, sexism, and interpersonal power dynamics, among others. The second attempts to describe what would constitute the antidote, namely symmetrical relationships of mutuality and equality. Both of these literatures counsel abandoning asymmetrical relationships in favor of the symmetrical. To the contrary, this paper argues that it is only in the context of asymmetrical relationships that humans can learn the basics of equality and mutual regard that undergird democracy. More particularly, the moral use of asymmetrical relations would be to help the young acquire, inter alias, the kinds of self-awareness and selfunderstanding that would enable them to function as responsible parties in symmetrical relations.Keywords Domination and acquiescence Á Asymmetrical and symmetrical relationships Á Moral uses of asymmetrical relations Á Teaching transformation Á Enabling participation in relations of mutuality and equality Á Teaching democracy Á Self-knowledge and moral responsibility Á Poetry and imagination in teaching Á Avoiding domination in teaching