Entanglements of Modernity, Colonialism and Genocide 2018
DOI: 10.4324/9781315122366-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The colonial entanglement, 1905–1945

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Forestalling the guilt attendant upon the massacre of peoples who were simply resisting the theft of their ancestral territories, the first settlers justified their actions through discourses which "removed Aborigines from the European's sphere of moral custody." 3 Constructing "primitive" peoples as morally and intellectually defective, closer to animals than civilized human beings, eighteenth-and nineteenth-century racial theoreticians provided timely support for "the crudely homicidal eliminationism" 4 on which the success of Australia' s colonization would rely. For if, as the men of science suggested, the life of a "savage" was a "life devoid of value," the extermination of Native tribes who obstructed colonial expansion could hardly be regarded as cause for moral censure.…”
Section: à à àmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Forestalling the guilt attendant upon the massacre of peoples who were simply resisting the theft of their ancestral territories, the first settlers justified their actions through discourses which "removed Aborigines from the European's sphere of moral custody." 3 Constructing "primitive" peoples as morally and intellectually defective, closer to animals than civilized human beings, eighteenth-and nineteenth-century racial theoreticians provided timely support for "the crudely homicidal eliminationism" 4 on which the success of Australia' s colonization would rely. For if, as the men of science suggested, the life of a "savage" was a "life devoid of value," the extermination of Native tribes who obstructed colonial expansion could hardly be regarded as cause for moral censure.…”
Section: à à àmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…35 Since 2000 scholars such as Palmer and Straus have criticized the Convention for excluding homosexuals. 36 Feindel in 2005 argued for a redefinition of genocide to include 'sexual orientation'. 37 A legal extension of group categories seems necessary to consider; moreover the social meanings of genocide are not reducible to law.…”
Section: The Meaning Of Genocidementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such was the extent of the violence, and the degree of official agency, there is a compelling case for it to be considered genocide (Richards, 2008). Regardless of whether it constitutes state sanctioned genocide, or "societally-led genocide", it is clear nonetheless that there was considerable public support for a policy of extermination (Palmer, 2000). There is a growing awareness, that claims such as those made by Keith Windshuttle (2003) that "there was nothing on the Aborigines' side that resembled frontier warfare, patriotic struggle or systematic resistance of any kind" are flawed (p. 26).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%