2016
DOI: 10.1187/cbe.15-04-0101
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The College Science Learning Cycle: An Instructional Model for Reformed Teaching

Abstract: This paper introduces a College Science Learning Cycle adapted from the popular Biological Sciences Curriculum Study 5E to help science, technology, engineering, and mathematics faculty develop course materials to support active, student-centered teaching approaches in their classrooms.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The CT+ modality allowed the lead and co-instructor to switch between active-learning activities and lecturing depending on the phase of the CT+ timeline. In particular, the CT+ timeline followed the basic elements of the 5E model as described by Tanner (2010) : 1) engagement (i.e., engage interest and activate students’ prior knowledge with a question, task, or problem), 2) exploration (i.e., student-driven information acquisition by grappling with a problem on their own or in groups), 3) explanation (i.e., the introduction of terms and concepts by the instructor), 4) elaboration (i.e., application of the newly acquired knowledge to a novel situation), and 5) evaluation (i.e., opportunities for students to reflect on and demonstrate their understanding or mastery of concepts and skills; Atkin and Karplus, 1962 ; Tanner, 2010 ; Withers, 2016 ). Thus, before class and at the start of class during the iRAT, students are experiencing engagement; however, during the broad concept introduction, one of the two instructors is Explaining terms and concepts.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The CT+ modality allowed the lead and co-instructor to switch between active-learning activities and lecturing depending on the phase of the CT+ timeline. In particular, the CT+ timeline followed the basic elements of the 5E model as described by Tanner (2010) : 1) engagement (i.e., engage interest and activate students’ prior knowledge with a question, task, or problem), 2) exploration (i.e., student-driven information acquisition by grappling with a problem on their own or in groups), 3) explanation (i.e., the introduction of terms and concepts by the instructor), 4) elaboration (i.e., application of the newly acquired knowledge to a novel situation), and 5) evaluation (i.e., opportunities for students to reflect on and demonstrate their understanding or mastery of concepts and skills; Atkin and Karplus, 1962 ; Tanner, 2010 ; Withers, 2016 ). Thus, before class and at the start of class during the iRAT, students are experiencing engagement; however, during the broad concept introduction, one of the two instructors is Explaining terms and concepts.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Faculty teaching is often constrained by time and course characteristics [ 27 , 108 ]. Participants in our study agree that time and student feedback were challenges to implementing active learning in the classroom ( Table 1 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Proficiency refers to the development of a skill to a proficient level, with scaffolded exposure to the new skill in increasingly complex situations aiding learning and mastery. 7 In a proficiency pathway, learning occurs via intermediate levels on the planned pathway [8][9][10] that guide further instruction to enable movement from novice to proficiency. 11 When sufficiently detailed, properly integrated and used for remediation, feedback enables movement of the learner along this pathway.…”
Section: Strengths and Limitations Of This Studymentioning
confidence: 99%