1983
DOI: 10.2307/3480140
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Collateral Source Rule and Contract Damages

Abstract: designed as a revision of C. MCCORMICK, CASES AND MATERIALS ON THE LAW OF DAMAGES (1935), affects to be comprehensive but offers no separate discussion of the contract problem beyond an approving reference to "the idea that the collateral source rule is a doctrine for tort cases." Id. at 675. His selection of contract cases is unsystematic and unrepresentative. D. DOBBS, HANDBOOK ON THE LAW OF REMEDIES (1973), makes the terse (and erroneous) statement that "the collateral source rule is not used at all in cont… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Eliminating the collateral source payment rule is yet another means. This rule prohibits the admission of evidence that the plaintiff or victim has received compensation from some source other than the damages sought against the defendant 13,14. Select states that have all but abrogated the collateral source rule include Alaska, California, Connecticut, Florida, Illinois, Michigan, Minnesota, Montana, and New Jersey.…”
Section: Reformsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Eliminating the collateral source payment rule is yet another means. This rule prohibits the admission of evidence that the plaintiff or victim has received compensation from some source other than the damages sought against the defendant 13,14. Select states that have all but abrogated the collateral source rule include Alaska, California, Connecticut, Florida, Illinois, Michigan, Minnesota, Montana, and New Jersey.…”
Section: Reformsmentioning
confidence: 99%