2010
DOI: 10.1080/01425691003700508
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The ‘collateral impact’ of pupil behaviour and geographically concentrated socio‐economic disadvantage

Abstract: Schools in areas of concentrated disadvantage tend to have below-average attainment, but there is no consensus on why. Mental and behavioural disorders in children are correlated with socio-economic disadvantage. This paper puts forward the hypothesis that the first phenomenon can at least partly be accounted for by the second phenomenon through the concept of 'collateral impact' -collateral impact refers to the effect of externalising or internalising behaviour by a pupil on other pupils' learning and attainm… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…OFSTED, the UK's school inspection authority, report that PRUs are undermined by negative stereotyping (OFSTED, 2009) and recognise many of the difficulties faced. Nevertheless, governments have been found to ignore the 'collateral impact' on learning and attainment of bringing a group of behaviourally challenged children together (David, 2010) and have set targets for pupils' academic performance that many mainstream schools could not achieve (Cole, 2015). In response, government ministers look to poor teaching as the main cause of academic failure and express the view that 'most local authority-run pupil referral units are not up to snuff' (Vasager and Shepherd, 2011).…”
Section: Research Context: Structural Toxicities and The Pupil Referral Unitmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…OFSTED, the UK's school inspection authority, report that PRUs are undermined by negative stereotyping (OFSTED, 2009) and recognise many of the difficulties faced. Nevertheless, governments have been found to ignore the 'collateral impact' on learning and attainment of bringing a group of behaviourally challenged children together (David, 2010) and have set targets for pupils' academic performance that many mainstream schools could not achieve (Cole, 2015). In response, government ministers look to poor teaching as the main cause of academic failure and express the view that 'most local authority-run pupil referral units are not up to snuff' (Vasager and Shepherd, 2011).…”
Section: Research Context: Structural Toxicities and The Pupil Referral Unitmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The extent of saccadic eye movements might indicate that the complexity of the scene has increased (Kahneman and Wright, 1971). Generally, the greater the mental effort, the greater the pupil diameter (David, 2010). It is widely accepted that humans possess limited capacity as information processors and that human performance is a function of task demands (Kahneman et al, 1968;David, 2010).…”
Section: Mental Effort In Front Of the Shelfmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally, the greater the mental effort, the greater the pupil diameter (David, 2010). It is widely accepted that humans possess limited capacity as information processors and that human performance is a function of task demands (Kahneman et al, 1968;David, 2010). Thus, it is expected that: H3.…”
Section: Mental Effort In Front Of the Shelfmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If peer skills do make a difference to children's progress, composition according to children's income-level is potentially important, given that differences by family socio-economic status in children's abilities and behaviours occur across countries (although their extent varies, depending on context and outcome) (Bradbury et al 2015;David, 2010;Duncan and Magnuson 2005). In England, children who are eligible for Free School Meals (FSM) in reception class of primary school do significantly less well on average in teacher assessments at the end of that year: 56% of children in receipt of FSM achieved a 'good level of development', compared to 72% of other children (DfE, 2017; the measure is discussed further below).…”
Section: Evidence On Peer Composition and Children's Development Withmentioning
confidence: 99%