Using the scanning method we carry out for the first time extensive simulations of trails and selfavoiding walks (SAWs) terminally attached to an adsorbing linear boundary on a square lattice. A bulk attraction energy is also defined for a self-intersection of a trail and a pair of nonbonded nearestneighbor monomers of a SAW. The chains are simulated at the special point. Our critical exponents differ significantly from the exact values of Vanderzande, Stella, and Seno [Phys. Rev. Lett. 67, 2757 (1991)] for the 0' model. Thus, their conjecture, that the 0 and 9' points belong to the same universality class, is not supported.PACS numbers: 64.60. Kw, 02.70.+d, 05.70.Jk, 36.20.Ey The collapse of polymers at the Flory 6 point [1,2] and their adsorption on a surface are fundamental phenomena in polymer physics with a wide range of industrial applications [3] and biological importance (e.g., protein folding [4]). From the theoretical point of view, a great deal of progress has been achieved in recent years in two dimensions (2D), mainly due to the advent of Coulomb-gas techniques [5] and conformal invariance [6]. The 0-point behavior has been usually modeled by self-avoiding walks (SAWs) on a lattice, where an attractive interaction energy is defined between a pair of nonbonded nearestneighbor (nn) monomers [7,8]. In a seminal work, Duplantier and Saleur (DS) [9] proposed the exact tricritical exponents of a collapsing polymer in 2D. In the bulk they calculated the shape exponent v, the partition function exponent 7, and the crossover exponent . They also obtained the free-energy surface exponents for a tricritical polymer that is terminally attached to a nonadsorbing impenetrable boundary (the ordinary point), 71=7 and 711 =v. These exponents have been derived for a special model of SAWs on a hexagonal lattice with randomly forbidden hexagons. However, it has been pointed out [10][11][12] that this model consists, in addition to the nn attractions, also of a special subset of the next-nearestneighbor attractions and therefore, instead of describing the usual 0 point, it might describe a multicritical 0' point [13]. A related question, raised by Shapir and Oono [14], concerns the universality class of trails, which are walks with a weaker excluded-volume restriction than that of SAWs [15]. They have argued that at tricriticality (unlike at infinite temperature) trails and SAWs may belong to different classes [16][17][18][19][20].The numerical results for the 0 point (i.e., for SAWs with nn attractions) and for tricritical trails mostly agree with the DS value v= j while the values for 7 are slightly smaller than the DS value f. On the other hand, the central values for