2018
DOI: 10.1785/0220180053
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Collaboratory for the Study of Earthquake Predictability: Achievements and Priorities

Abstract: The Collaboratory for the Study of Earthquake Predictability (CSEP) is a global cyberinfrastructure for prospective evaluations of earthquake forecast models and prediction algorithms. CSEP's goals are to improve our understanding of earthquake predictability, advance forecasting model development, test key scientific hypotheses and their predictive power, and to improve seismic hazard assessments. Since its inception in California in 2007, the global CSEP collaboration has been conducting forecast experiments… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
64
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 93 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 78 publications
(67 reference statements)
0
64
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In other fields, this has led to spurious identification of precursors, e.g., accelerating moment release prior to large earthquakes 42 . Cross-validation constrains these biases, however the gold standard for forecasting is evaluation of a frozen model on future data 43 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In other fields, this has led to spurious identification of precursors, e.g., accelerating moment release prior to large earthquakes 42 . Cross-validation constrains these biases, however the gold standard for forecasting is evaluation of a frozen model on future data 43 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various metrics were developed in crustal seismology to test the forecasts of tectonic earthquakes. Some of them are used on a routine basis (Schorlemmer et al 2018). This paper suggests the adoption of one of these metrics -area skill score -for testing the spatial forecasts of seismic hazard in mines.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been adopted by many research institutions or governmental agencies in the United States, Switzerland, Italy, New Zealand, Japan, China, and so on. (Schorlemmer et al 2018). The ETAS model is now accepted as the standard model for describing earthquake clusters (e.g., Schorlemmer et al 2018;Huang et al 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Schorlemmer et al 2018). The ETAS model is now accepted as the standard model for describing earthquake clusters (e.g., Schorlemmer et al 2018;Huang et al 2016). Such a model is also used in crime data analysis (see, e.g., Mohler et al 2011) and in economics, where studies show that the interaction between prices has epidemic features (e.g., Bacry and Muzy 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%