The Collaborative Multiracial Post-Election Survey (Cmps): Building the Academic Pipeline Through Data Access, Publication, and Networking Opportunities

Frasure-Yokley, Lorrie; Wong, Janelle; Vargas, Edward D.; Barreto, Matt A.

doi:10.1017/s1049096519001185

Cited by 10 publications

(11 citation statements)

References 1 publication

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Collaboration with and inclusion of new coauthors in research partnerships are positive not only for gender diversity in the field. Many wide-ranging studies also share a positive underlying view of collaboration (Butler, Butler, and Rich 2008; Frasure-Yokley et al 2020; Herrick, Matthias, and Nielson 2015; McDermott 2010; McDermott and Hatemi 2010; Sigelman 2009; Wildavsky 1986). Collaboration has been widely discussed as necessary for the internationalization of scholarship (Appleton and Mazur 2006; Bleck, Dendere, and Sangaré 2018; Mazur 2005; Sinmazdemir 2019).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Publication Gender Gap, Collaboration, and an Index of Inclusion for Scholars Publishing Peer-Reviewed Research

Williams

2022

APSC

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Publication Gender Gap, Collaboration, and an Index of Inclusion for Scholars Publishing Peer-Reviewed Research

Williams

2022

APSC

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Nonetheless, relatively little is known about what factors influence the salience of immigration policy across the Latino electorate beyond one particular election cycle. This is an important area of research not only because of the growing share of immigrants residing in the US but also because immigration salience has substantially fluctuated in recent years (Frasure-Yokley et al 2013;Barreto et al 2014;Hipsman et al 2016;Barreto et al 2017). In this paper, we set out to address this gap in the literature by examining several determinants of immigration salience among Latino voters in the 2008, 2012, and 2016 presidential elections.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…While the economy and jobs have long been salient issues for the American public (Pew Research Center 2020a), racial and ethnic minorities tend to have distinct policy agendas from non-Hispanic whites (Frasure-Yokley et al 2013;Barreto et al 2014;Barreto et al 2017). Among Latinos, who account for about 18% of the US population (Cillffo and Fry 2020), immigration has long been a wedge issue, leading many to conclude that Latino voters are a single-issue public who are only moved by immigration policy messaging of parties and candidates (White 2016).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Besides testing (1) personal connection to immigration, this study analyses whether alternative predictors of immigration salience such as (2) group identity and (3) consumption of Spanish-language news media impact perceptions of immigration salience among the Latino electorate in past presidential elections. Through a series of analyses using multiple post-presidential election surveys (Frasure-Yokley et al 2013;Barreto et al 2014;Barreto et al 2017), this study allows for analyses of correlates to immigration salience that are not tied to any particular election cycle. In doing so, this study not only expands our understanding of one of the most prominent policy issues of our time (Böhmelt and Ezrow 2020;Hare and Monogan 2020) but also contributes to knowledge on the determinants of issue salience among racial and ethnic minority groups in the US.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Fluctuations of immigration salience: testing alternative explanations of policy salience among US Latinos

2023

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

What makes immigration a salient issue among Latinos? We focus on immigration – one of the most pressing issues facing the United States (US) – and evaluate the factors that motivate immigration salience among Latinos over several election cycles. Although immigration policy has been linked with the Latino electorate over the period of our study due to high foreign-born rates and mixed-status families within this community, immigration policy has actually not been the dominant issue for the majority of Latino voters over this time period. Using survey responses from the 2008, 2012 and 2016 elections, we test multiple theories of issue salience by exploring social, political and individual determinants of policy salience among Latino voters. We find that in addition to nativity, consumption of ethnic media and group identity are associated with reporting immigration as a salient issue. These findings provide a valuable addition to literature of public opinion on immigration and the origins of policy issue salience among ethno-racial minorities in the US.

show abstract

“…The Collaborative Multi-Racial Post-Election Survey (CMPS) oversamples racial minorities, precluding direct comparisons with White voters (Frasure-Yokley et al 2020). Although combining these estimates is a useful future research tasks, differences in the surevys' timing, survey mode, sampling strategy, and question wording could confound the interpretations.…”

Section: Ginglesmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Geography of Racially Polarized Voting: Calibrating Surveys at the District Level

Kuriwaki¹,

Ansolabehere²,

DAGONEL³

et al. 2021

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Voting in the United States has long been known to divide sharply along racial lines, and the degree of racially polarized voting evidently varies across regions, and even within a state. Researchers have further studied variation in racially polarized voting using aggregate data techniques, but these methods assume that variation in individual preferences is not related to geography. This paper presents estimates based on individual level data of the extent and variation in racially polarized voting across US Congressional Districts. Leveraging large, geocoded sample surveys, we develop an improved method for measuring racial voting patterns at the Congressional District-level. The method overcomes challenges in previous attempts of survey modeling by allowing survey data to inform the synthetic population model. This method has sufficient power to provide precise estimates of racial polarization even when survey data are sparse. We find that variation across districts but within states explains roughly 20 percent of the total variation; states explain a further 20 percent of the total variation, and 55 percent of the variation is simply national differences between races. The Deep South still has the highest racial polarization between White and Black voters, but some Midwestern congressional districts exhibit comparably high polarization. The polarization between White and Hispanic voters is far more variable than between Black and White voters.

show abstract

The Collaborative Multiracial Post-Election Survey (Cmps): Building the Academic Pipeline Through Data Access, Publication, and Networking Opportunities

Cited by 10 publications

References 1 publication

The Publication Gender Gap, Collaboration, and an Index of Inclusion for Scholars Publishing Peer-Reviewed Research

The Publication Gender Gap, Collaboration, and an Index of Inclusion for Scholars Publishing Peer-Reviewed Research

Fluctuations of immigration salience: testing alternative explanations of policy salience among US Latinos

The Geography of Racially Polarized Voting: Calibrating Surveys at the District Level

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About