The collaborative cube puzzle

Wideström, Josef; Axelsson, Ann-Sofie; Schroeder, Ralph; Nilsson, Alexander; Heldal, Ilona; Abelin, Åsa

doi:10.1145/351006.351035

Cited by 31 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 1 publication

(6 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…From early work (Axelsson et al, 1999;Slater et al, 2000;Wideström et al, 2000;Schroeder et al, 2001) to more recent studies (e.g., Andrist et al, 2017) lab studies in which participants come to the lab for a single visit have provided valuable insights on collaboration in VR. Researchers have explored immersion and leadership behavior (Steed et al, 1999), workload experienced by team members (Pouliquen-Lardy et al, 2016), environmental and social presence and the relationship between dimensions of presence (Steed et al, 1999;Slater et al, 2000).…”

Section: Related Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

Working Together on Diverse Tasks: A Longitudinal Study on Individual Workload, Presence and Emotional Recognition in Collaborative Virtual Environments

Khojasteh

Won

2021

Front. Virtual Real.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Numerous studies have shown the potential benefits of collaborative virtual environments (CVEs) for distributed teams. However, there are few longitudinal studies on collaboration in immersive virtual environments, and existing studies mostly examine how pairs or groups adapt over time. In a longitudinal study, we examined what does and does not change over time as individual users adapt to collaboration in virtual environments. In our mixed-methods, exploratory study, we matched 20 participants in random pairs over five sessions. We assigned each participant to complete a different collaborative task, with a different partner, in each session. Our quantitative data analysis and qualitative interview data show that adaptation to VR increased significantly over time. Presence ratings did not show change over time, but participants reported developing new ways to communicate in VR. We also identified patterns indicating a relationship between a person’s emotional state and their partner’s ability to recognize their emotion. We conclude with a discussion of our findings and provide design implications and future directions for designers and researchers in the field.

show abstract

Section: Related Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

Working Together on Diverse Tasks: A Longitudinal Study on Individual Workload, Presence and Emotional Recognition in Collaborative Virtual Environments

Khojasteh

Won

2021

Front. Virtual Real.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Churchill and Snowdon [14] discussed the nature of collaboration within virtual environments already in 1998, pointing towards the essential characteristics of collaborative work, emphasizing the need for appropriate information representation and communication tools to support collaborative work. Studies about asymmetrical interaction and collaboration using immersive technologies provide insights and design considerations in regard to aspects such as co-presence, awareness, leadership roles and task contribution, communication and collaboration, and co-manipulation of objects [15,23,45,54]. Cordeil et al [18] evaluated the collaborative aspects of two IA systems (CAVE and HMD) in terms of collaboration strategies, shared focus, completion time, self-perception of collaboration, proportion of oral communication, and balance of physical movements.…”

Section: Immersive Interaction and Collaborationmentioning

confidence: 99%

“Oh, that’s where you are!” – Towards a Hybrid Asymmetric Collaborative Immersive Analytics System

Reski

Alissandrakis

Tyrkkö

et al. 2020

Proceedings of the 11th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Shaping Experiences, Shaping Society

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

We present a hybrid Immersive Analytics system to support asymmetrical collaboration between a pair of users during synchronous data exploration. The system consists of an immersive Virtual Reality application, a non-immersive web application, and a real-time communication interface connecting both applications to provide features to facilitate the collaborators' mutual understanding and their ability to make (spatial) references. We conducted a real world case study with pairs of language students, encouraging them to use the developed system to investigate a large multivariate Twitter dataset from a sociolinguistic perspective within an explorative analysis scenario. Based on the results of usability scores, log file analyses, observations, and interviews, we were able to validate the approach in general, and gain insights into the users' collaboration with respect to awareness, deixis, and group dynamics. CCS Concepts: • Human-centered computing → Virtual reality; Collaborative interaction; Empirical studies in HCI ; Collaborative and social computing.

show abstract

“…Relativamente às medidas de apreciação subjetiva, os resultados revelam que os Cenários de Indução Afetiva 3D provocam maior sensação de presença do que os seus homólogos projetados em 2D, e por isso, estão de acordo com a literatura especializada, recente (Baños et al, 2004;Freeman & Avons, 2000;Slater et al, 2009;Usoh et al, 2000;Wideström, Axelsson, Shroeder, Nilsson, & Aeblin, 2000).…”

Section: Discussionunclassified

A indução afetiva em cenários de realidade virtual: avaliação da sensação de presença

Ribeiro

Monteiro

2015

Psicol. clin.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A Realidade Virtual (RV) tem sido utilizada na indução de emoções associadas a respostas emocionais de maior validade ecológica. A presença, enquanto experiência de "estar lá", num determinado ambiente mediado, tornou-se intimamente associada à RV. O presente trabalho tem como objetivo verificar se a visualização dos Cenários de Indução Afetiva 3D induz uma maior sensação de presença comparativamente aos seus homólogos apresentados com a tecnologia 2D. Apresentamos a 30 participantes saudáveis os Cenários de Indução Afetiva 3D em ambas as modalidades de visualização (2D vs.3D), simultaneamente efetuavam-se registros psicofisiológicos da Atividade Eletrodérmica e do Ritmo Cardíaco e, no final da visualização de cada cenário, aplicamos a escala de dominância do Self-Assessment Manikinadaptada para medir a presença, bem como o Slater-Usoh-Steed Questionnaire, que é um instrumento de autorrelato para avaliação da sensação de presença provocada. Os resultados globais sugerem que Cenários de Indução Afetiva 3D induzem uma maior sensação de presença, comparativamente aos seus homólogos apresentados na tecnologia 2D. Verificamos ainda que o cenário de valência desagradável provoca maior sensação de presença comparativamente com os cenários de valência agradável e neutro.

show abstract

The collaborative cube puzzle

Cited by 31 publications

References 1 publication

Working Together on Diverse Tasks: A Longitudinal Study on Individual Workload, Presence and Emotional Recognition in Collaborative Virtual Environments

Working Together on Diverse Tasks: A Longitudinal Study on Individual Workload, Presence and Emotional Recognition in Collaborative Virtual Environments

“Oh, that’s where you are!” – Towards a Hybrid Asymmetric Collaborative Immersive Analytics System

A indução afetiva em cenários de realidade virtual: avaliação da sensação de presença

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About