2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.shpsa.2022.12.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The cognitive map debate in insects: A historical perspective on what is at stake

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 104 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Before the work by O'Keefe and Nadel ( 1978 ), there was much debate about the existence of cognitive maps in a large spectrum of the animal world. This debate still continues, for example, whether cognitive maps exist in insects (Dhein, 2023 ).…”
Section: Previous Work: the Causal Cognitive Architecturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Before the work by O'Keefe and Nadel ( 1978 ), there was much debate about the existence of cognitive maps in a large spectrum of the animal world. This debate still continues, for example, whether cognitive maps exist in insects (Dhein, 2023 ).…”
Section: Previous Work: the Causal Cognitive Architecturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Insects have been important experimental subjects for neuroethologists since the field’s inception (Dhein 2022; Hoyle 1970; Ronacher 2019), and a long-standing debate within insect neuroethology concerns modeling and explaining insect navigation (Dhein 2023). Historically, neuroethologists focused on behavioral traits that were relatively stereotyped and reproducible in laboratory settings (e.g., a toad shooting its tongue at prey, a fish’s rhythmic fin movement, or a cricket singing).…”
Section: The Cognitive Map Debate In Neuroethologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although participants do not explicitly frame the cognitive map debate in terms of instinct versus learning, there are historical ties and conceptual affinities linking the cognitive map debate to twentieth-century debates about the relative contributions of instinct versus learning to animal behavior (Dhein 2023). The cognitive map model aligns with American psychology’s learning-heavy approach to theorizing about animal behavior, while the toolkit model aligns with German ethology’s instinct-heavy approach.…”
Section: The Cognitive Map Debate In Neuroethologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From this, novel routes and shortcuts to the goal can be created. While the cognitive map has received widespread attention across a range of species (birds, [ 4 ] insects [ 5 ] (but see [ 6 ] and mammals [ 7 ]), an alternative account of spatial learning based on associative learning theory (e.g., see [ 8 ]) may provide a better and arguably simpler explanation. With this model, only certain elements of the environment are learned and associated, and the association is formed only when required; as such, there is no need to develop a full map of the environment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%