2021
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-78205-4_28
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Cognitive-Historical Origins of Conceptual Ambiguity in Social Theory

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 47 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…James House (2019, p. 21) recently asserted that "it is increasingly difficult to achieve even a Quaker consensus as to what sociology is." Sociologists often cannot agree on the definition of core concepts that are nevertheless widely used in the field (see also Lizardo 2021, Abend 2023. Perhaps putting his finger on the problem directly, Arthur Stinchcombe once joked that other social sciences were "monogamous" in their outcomes of interest while being "promiscuous" in examining independent variables, sociology was uniquely promiscuous in its choice of dependent variables as well.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…James House (2019, p. 21) recently asserted that "it is increasingly difficult to achieve even a Quaker consensus as to what sociology is." Sociologists often cannot agree on the definition of core concepts that are nevertheless widely used in the field (see also Lizardo 2021, Abend 2023. Perhaps putting his finger on the problem directly, Arthur Stinchcombe once joked that other social sciences were "monogamous" in their outcomes of interest while being "promiscuous" in examining independent variables, sociology was uniquely promiscuous in its choice of dependent variables as well.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%