Aggressive Offenders' Cognition 2007
DOI: 10.1002/9780470746295.ch1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Cognitive Distortions and Implicit Theories of Child Sexual Abusers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The literature on over-arching schemas (Thakker, Ward, & Navathe, 2007) and implicit theories describes several classes of mitigating self-statements that are employed by rapists. Each of these classes suggests a means by which inhibition on performing sexual violence can be reduced:…”
Section: The Role Of Mitigating Self-statementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The literature on over-arching schemas (Thakker, Ward, & Navathe, 2007) and implicit theories describes several classes of mitigating self-statements that are employed by rapists. Each of these classes suggests a means by which inhibition on performing sexual violence can be reduced:…”
Section: The Role Of Mitigating Self-statementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some research has indicated that clinical and research attention should focus on sexual offenders' cognitive structures and cognitive processes underlying cognitive distortions, for assessing offenders and preventing recidivism (Kanters et al., ; Mann & Beech, ; Maruna & Mann, ; Thakker, Ward, & Navathe, ; Ward, ; Ward, Gannon, & Keown, ; Ward & Keenan, ). What individuals can introspectively access and express to some extent, however, is neither cognitive structures nor cognitive processes but cognitive products, that is, “the thoughts, inferences, understandings, and imagery” (Langton, , p. 95).…”
Section: Critique and Significance Of Questionnaire Studies On Sexualmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In other words, they appear to think that cognitive distortions have a maintenance rather than a causal relationship with sex offending (Mann & Beech, 2003). The function of cognitive distortions is thus to act as a defensive mechanism (Thakker, Ward, & Navathe, 2007) protecting the offender's ego from negative appraisal and consequent emotional states such as guilt. Mann & Beech (2003) recently critically evaluated Abel's original explanation of cognitive distortions and pointed out that it was unclear from the original paper whether they believed that cognitive distortions were conscious or unconscious.…”
Section: Locating Cognitive Distortions Within Theories Of Sexual Offmentioning
confidence: 99%