2011
DOI: 10.3389/fninf.2011.00017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Cognitive Atlas: Toward a Knowledge Foundation for Cognitive Neuroscience

Abstract: Cognitive neuroscience aims to map mental processes onto brain function, which begs the question of what “mental processes” exist and how they relate to the tasks that are used to manipulate and measure them. This topic has been addressed informally in prior work, but we propose that cumulative progress in cognitive neuroscience requires a more systematic approach to representing the mental entities that are being mapped to brain function and the tasks used to manipulate and measure mental processes. We descri… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
302
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 303 publications
(314 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
(46 reference statements)
2
302
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition to this, the MCQ is a validated monetary discounting measure that has been widely used to assess discounting in the laboratory (Frederick, Loewenstein, and O'Donoghue, 2002), not only in experimental economics but also in a wide range of fields in the cognitive science. In fact, the version that we used for our main experiment-that is the 27-item MCQ, is listed in the Cognitive Atlas, a collaborative project that aims to provide a knowledge base for cognitive science (Poldrack et al, 2011). As a result, we considered this tool as a valid method to investigate delay discounting, also in terms of reproducible research.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to this, the MCQ is a validated monetary discounting measure that has been widely used to assess discounting in the laboratory (Frederick, Loewenstein, and O'Donoghue, 2002), not only in experimental economics but also in a wide range of fields in the cognitive science. In fact, the version that we used for our main experiment-that is the 27-item MCQ, is listed in the Cognitive Atlas, a collaborative project that aims to provide a knowledge base for cognitive science (Poldrack et al, 2011). As a result, we considered this tool as a valid method to investigate delay discounting, also in terms of reproducible research.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whilst the function categories applied in this review are reasonable from a psychology perspective, they may not constitute the most appropriate means of defining and organising the processes involved in design. This may be seen to mirror current ontological debates in psychology and neuroscience research, where efforts are under way to develop a shared ontology of processes and relationships [71]. Several design researchers have proposed ontologies, e.g.…”
Section: Key Observations and Future Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MRI parameter attributes (parameters such as the echo time) were imported from the DICOM lexicon (Clunie, 2000). Currently, we use attributes in the experimental psychology classes to store labels from the cognitive atlas (Poldrack et al, 2011) or cognitive paradigm (Turner and Laird, 2012) ontologies, as those seemed too large to be imported fully in the classification.…”
Section: Domain Classification For Neuroimagingmentioning
confidence: 99%