The Cofemel revolution – originality, equality and neutrality

Levin, Marianne

doi:10.4324/9781003156277-7

Cited by 21 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 1 publication

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Для определения основных направлений правового обеспечения цифрового искусства автор обращался к результатам исследований по выявлению наиболее эффективных подходов к пониманию и законодательному закреплению цифровых прав (Kuznetsov & Chumachenko, 2018;Konobeevskaya, 2019), описанию цифровых произведений как объектов гражданского оборота (Rusakova, Frolova & Gorbacheva, 2020;Ovchinnikov & Fathi, 2019;Teliukina, 2018), правовому анализу цифровых платформ (Gabov, 2021;Altukhov & Kashkin, 2021;Lobel, 2016). В доктрине обоснованно много внимания уделяется вопросам охраноспособности и прав интеллектуальной собственности на произведения искусства в цифровой сфере, авторских прав в виртуальной среде (Ippolitov, 2021;Tolochko, 2021;Rakhmatullina, 2020;Grin, 2020;Entin, 2017;Bonadio, Lucchi & Mazziotti, 2022;Levin, 2021;Ramalho, 2021), равно как и статуса искусственного интеллекта и появления цифровой личности (Bridey, 2012;Barfield & Pagallo, 2020;Krysanova, 2021;Aleshkova, 2021;Vlasov, 2021;Kharitonova & Savina, 2020). Вместе с тем, нет комплексных исследований понятия, видов, правового статуса цифрового искусства, направлений правового обеспечения цифровизации искусства.…”

Section: материалы и методыunclassified

“…37-39 решения по делам Infopaq International, C-5/08, п.п.35-37 решения по делу Levola Hengelo, C-310/17 от 13.11.0218.6 Гармонизация вопросов авторства на цифровые произведения в масштабе ЕС широко поддерживается в европейской правовой доктрине и нашли отражение в Директиве ЕС 2019/790 от 17 апреля 2019 г. Об авторских и смежных правах на Едином Цифровом Рынке ЕС -см. :(Synadinou, 2021;Levin, 2021;Ramalho, 2021).…”

unclassified

See 1 more Smart Citation

Legal support for digitalization of art

Mikhaliova

2023

Vestn. Ross. univ. družby nar., Ser. Ûrid. nauki

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The relevance of digital art and digitalization of art, as a more general category, reflecting the modern technological approach to this sphere of human activity, is manifested in mainstreaming of legal regulation of various aspects of digital technologies impact on the sphere of creativity and their inclusion in the legislative agenda. The article reveals the legal features of digitalization of art at the present stage. It examines the main areas of digitalization of art and legal means to ensure their support. The broad and narrow approaches to the concept of “digital art” have been outlined. The issues of defining intellectual property rights for the results of creativity (works) produced with artificial intelligence and increasing access to works of art and cultural objects in the digital age have been analyzed. The paper applies interdisciplinary approach, methods of analysis and synthesis, abstraction as well as formal-legal and comparative-legal methods. Based on the analysis the author forms the concept of three determinative directions which enable complex processes of combination of creativity and technologies in an integrated way of “development”, “circulation” and “distributed security” of art.

show abstract

Section: материалы и методыunclassified

unclassified

Legal support for digitalization of art

Mikhaliova

2023

Vestn. Ross. univ. družby nar., Ser. Ûrid. nauki

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Copyright and the Court of Justice of the European Union

Rosati

2023

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

First released in early 2019, Copyright and the Court of Justice of the European Union is still the only book completely devoted to the case law of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) in the EU copyright field. It seeks to understand the Court’s role and action in the area of copyright and the resulting legacy. In his foreword to the first edition, First Advocate General Maciej Szpunar praised the ‘extremely profound analysis … of EU copyright protection and relevant Court of Justice decisions’ finding that it constituted ‘uncharted territory, unveiling new information, perhaps never considered, even by members of the Court’. Between the first and the present edition, a lot has happened in the EU copyright field. Besides macro-events like the now completed departure of the UK from the EU and the adoption of the DSM Directive (2019/790), significant developments have also occurred in the case law of the CJEU. Among other things, seminal judgments have been issued, which touch upon all the main foundational aspects of EU copyright. This new edition is thus the result of a work of substantial revision. It provides novel insights into the activity of the CJEU in the copyright field and reflects on the resulting implications for the present and future of EU copyright.

show abstract

Copyright Page

Rosati

2023

Copyright and the Court of Justice of the European Union

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The Cofemel revolution – originality, equality and neutrality

Cited by 21 publications

References 1 publication

Legal support for digitalization of art

Legal support for digitalization of art

Copyright and the Court of Justice of the European Union

Copyright Page

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About