2014
DOI: 10.1111/evo.12368
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Coevolutionary Implications of Host Tolerance

Abstract: Host tolerance to infectious disease, whereby hosts do not directly "fight" parasites but instead ameliorate the damage caused, is an important defense mechanism in both plants and animals. Because tolerance to parasite virulence may lead to higher prevalence of disease in a population, evolutionary theory tells us that while the spread of resistance genes will result in negative frequency dependence and the potential for diversification, the evolution of tolerance is instead likely to result in fixation. Howe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
81
2
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(86 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
2
81
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Invasion, infection, or pathogen growth -each a scale-dependent process -can determine pathogen impacts such as loss of growth and mortality. In contrast, persistence can result from a combination of factors including survival as a saprotroph, a broad host range (generalism) combined with tolerance (host amelioration of negative impacts) in some hosts (Best et al 2014), and/or formation of long-lived survival structures (Smith et al 2006). Disease destructiveness and persistence may interact in evolutionary and ecologically complex ways such as diseases that are persistent but not destructive, destructive but not persistent, and most consequentially, destructive and persistent disease.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Invasion, infection, or pathogen growth -each a scale-dependent process -can determine pathogen impacts such as loss of growth and mortality. In contrast, persistence can result from a combination of factors including survival as a saprotroph, a broad host range (generalism) combined with tolerance (host amelioration of negative impacts) in some hosts (Best et al 2014), and/or formation of long-lived survival structures (Smith et al 2006). Disease destructiveness and persistence may interact in evolutionary and ecologically complex ways such as diseases that are persistent but not destructive, destructive but not persistent, and most consequentially, destructive and persistent disease.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…serves as a concise metaphor for the selection pressures on hosts to constantly change defense mechanisms against pathogens and the counterselection on the pathogens for continuously developing means for overcoming such evolving defenses, resulting in the appearance of both organisms "running in place" (1). Variations of the Red Queen as well as alternative theories, most unified around the centrality of biotic interactions as a driving force, have been proposed as explanations for (i) taxon extinction [Van Valen's original Red Queen's hypothesis (2)]; (ii) the evolution and maintenance of sex, genetic recombination, and immune systems (3)(4)(5); (iii) as a framework for understanding invasions of exotic species (6); and (iv) as mechanism(s) selecting for hostpathogen coevolution [i.e., broad versus specific host ranges and/or host tolerance (7)(8)(9)]. …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The crucial difference is that resistance reduces the risk of infection and/or the replication rate of the parasite in the host, whereas tolerance does not (but note that tolerance can still impose selection on the parasite [3]). It is important to distinguish between resistance and tolerance because these two types of defence lead to different ecological and evolutionary interactions between hosts and their parasites [3][6]. For example, if hosts evolve resistance, this should reduce the prevalence of the parasite in the host population.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%