2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2010.09.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The coefficient of restitution of some pharmaceutical tablets/compacts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
14
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For different kinds of coated tablets they found CoR values that ranged from 0.4 to 0.9 (30). For polystyrene balls, a value of 0.81 was approximated as CoR (19).…”
Section: Coefficient Of Restitutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For different kinds of coated tablets they found CoR values that ranged from 0.4 to 0.9 (30). For polystyrene balls, a value of 0.81 was approximated as CoR (19).…”
Section: Coefficient Of Restitutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is the significance of the choice of the value of the coefficient of restitution, e = 0.2 (e.g., pharmaceutical compacts; see for example (Bharadwaj et al 2010) [25] and the fluid viscosity of η = 0.985 Pa-s (e.g., castor oil) with density similar to that of water in the simulation results presented here to highlight the interactions between highly inelastic "soft" collisions in the presence of moderately high fluid viscosity. These choices were made to allow the assembly simulations to reach "steady-state" within a reasonable computational time frame; see for example, Koenders, et al (2001) [26].…”
Section: Comparison Of Large-scale Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to obtain a reasonable compromise between Table 2 The material parameters used in the numerical simulations (Roberts R. et al, 1994;Bharadwaj R. et al, 2010;Darelius A. et al, 2007;Li L. et al, 2015b) Variable Unit Value…”
Section: Generalmentioning
confidence: 99%