“…In their attempts to better understand how organizational spaces are conceptualized and struggled for, organization scholars have drawn heavily on Lefebvre's spatial triad, in particular to address the interrelation of power, identity, and materiality Steyaert, 2012, 2013;Burrell and Dale, 2003;Dale, 2005;Dale and Burrell, 2008;De Vaujany and Vaast, 2013;Dobers and Strannegård, 2004;Harding, 2004, 2008;Hancock and Spicer, 2011;Hernes, 2004;Kingma, 2008;Spicer, 2009;Spicer and Taylor, 2006;Taylor and Spicer, 2007;Wapshott and Mallett, 2012;Wasserman and Frenkel, 2011;Watkins, 2005;Yeung, 1998;Zhang et al, 2008;Zhang and Spicer, 2014). For example, studies have shown how the materiality of space influences the construction of selves through forms of organizational oppression and control (Ford and Harding, 2008), analyzing both the power of aesthetically enchanting architectures (Hancock and Spicer, 2011), and the aesthetic strategies of workers to resist space-driven identity regulation (Wasserman and Frenkel, 2011).…”