The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
1982
DOI: 10.1016/0304-4149(82)90011-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The coalescent

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

13
1,628
0
15

Year Published

1999
1999
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2,250 publications
(1,688 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
13
1,628
0
15
Order By: Relevance
“…To examine the robustness property of our IA estimate in the presence of genetic drift, the final simulation experiment we present incorporates a simple evolution model, which roughly corresponds to the intermixture model in Long (1991) and each remains constant in time. Genealogies are generated according to coalescent theory (Kingman 1982) and using the program ms (Hudson 2002). Each genealogy represents a chromosomal segment of 5cM.…”
Section: Simulation 4: Effects Of Ld and Genetic Drift All Simulatiomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To examine the robustness property of our IA estimate in the presence of genetic drift, the final simulation experiment we present incorporates a simple evolution model, which roughly corresponds to the intermixture model in Long (1991) and each remains constant in time. Genealogies are generated according to coalescent theory (Kingman 1982) and using the program ms (Hudson 2002). Each genealogy represents a chromosomal segment of 5cM.…”
Section: Simulation 4: Effects Of Ld and Genetic Drift All Simulatiomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To assess historical genetic connectivity, we estimated the number of migrants per generation from the scaled migration rate, M ¼ 4Nem/h, where m is the migration rate. Time to most recent common ancestor (TMRCA) and effective population size were estimated from the mutation parameter h [Kingman (1982), see also Hein et al (2005)] using a generation time of 20 years (based on flowering time; unpubl. data).…”
Section: Demographic History and Historical Connectivitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This model is in turn formally equivalent to a model of coalescing random walks (Holley and Liggett, 1975;Liggett, 1985;Chave et al, 2002), an equivalence that provided the basis for the coalescence theory in genetics (Kingman, 1982). At time t; the voter at site x has a preference passed on through exactly one source or antecedent, for every time t À t5t: Let A x ðtÞ be the position of this antecedent at time t À t; so that A x ð0Þ ¼ x: This is a simple random walk, where the distance jjA x ðtÞ À A x ðt þ 1Þjj 2 travelled at each timestep is 1.…”
Section: Voter Model and The No Speciation Limitmentioning
confidence: 99%