2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijproman.2019.01.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The co-creation of values-in-use at the front end of infrastructure development programs

Abstract: There has been recent academic interest in programs as value creation processes. Scholars focus particularly on the front end of programs as opportunities for clients to create value. At the front end, client and market partners can actively co-produce value through co-creation sessions. This paper investigates what stakeholders do in co-creation sessions and how this contributes to the co-creation of value at the front end of programs. We used an action research approach combined with participant observation,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
52
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
(110 reference statements)
1
52
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Contrary to our expectations, however, altruism influences both types of co-innovation with significantly more intensity in the sample of non-expert users than in the sample of experts. This finding is consistent with the research of [84], who explain that people who view themselves as less expert are generous with the resources they share in virtual environments-in this case, ideas for co-innovation with service firms and with the platform. They do not require anything in exchange because they do not believe that they have made an important contribution.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Contrary to our expectations, however, altruism influences both types of co-innovation with significantly more intensity in the sample of non-expert users than in the sample of experts. This finding is consistent with the research of [84], who explain that people who view themselves as less expert are generous with the resources they share in virtual environments-in this case, ideas for co-innovation with service firms and with the platform. They do not require anything in exchange because they do not believe that they have made an important contribution.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Second, this study represents a significant and original advance over prior research on the moderating effect of perceived level of expertise in the co-creation process [84], as prior studies do not propose either the antecedents analyzed here or the sustainable co-creation behaviors identified. Studying the variable expertise is of great interest to the virtual community because expertise shared by the community's participants is the main asset for this type of digital environment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The ten contributions cover different levels of analysis: project, program, project-oriented organization, and project alliance, indicating the broad application of value creation in project settings. They also cover different project phases: from the front end of a program (Liu et al, 2019) to the execution phase (Fuentes and Smyth, 2019;Pargar et al, 2019;Vuorinen and Martinsuo, 2019) and finally to the solution's end-of-life phase (Invernizzi et al, 2019), showing the relevance of value creation over the project lifecycle. With these contributions, the special issue succeeded in its aim to develop new knowledge about successful ways to negotiate and deliver value in complex and uncertain project-related contexts.…”
Section: Conclusion and Future Research Opportunitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Projects and programmes are being re-conceptualised as value creation processes for multiple actors, and there have been numerous calls for more research on value creation at the front-end (Winter and Szczepanek 2008;Smyth et al 2018;Liu et al 2019;Martinsuo et al 2019). In recent years, the concept of value co-creation has been gaining some traction in the construction management literature (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%