1999
DOI: 10.1086/307297
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The CNOC2 Field Galaxy Luminosity Function. I. A Description of Luminosity Function Evolution

Abstract: We examine the evolution of the galaxy luminosity function (LF) using a sample of over 2000 galaxies, with 0.12 < z < 0.55 and 17.0 < R c < 21.5, drawn from the Canadian Network for Observational Cosmology Field Galaxy Redshift Survey (CNOC2), at present the largest such sample at intermediate redshifts. We use UBVR c I c photometry and the spectral energy distributions (SED's) of Coleman, Wu, & Weedman (1980) to classify our galaxies into early, intermediate, and late types, for which we compute luminosity fu… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

22
364
2
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 220 publications
(389 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
(93 reference statements)
22
364
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A similar formalism was used in the analysis of CNOC2 data by Lin et al (1999). The linear form of equation (20) approximates the passively evolving stellar populations of the BC96 models.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A similar formalism was used in the analysis of CNOC2 data by Lin et al (1999). The linear form of equation (20) approximates the passively evolving stellar populations of the BC96 models.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The parameters M à and à in equation (12) In estimating the parameters of this LF [Q; m; M à ð0Þ; , and à ð0Þ], we follow the procedure described in Lin et al (1999). First, we use the STY method with p i defined in the same way as equation (14) to estimate M à ð0Þ, Q, and .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This noevolution assumption is usually justified by appealing to results from galaxy number counts ( Im et al 2002;Schade et al 1999) and the redshift distribution of lens galaxies (Ofek et al 2003), which are consistent with the hypothesis that the early-type population evolves only through passive luminosity evolution. However, the observational status of early-type evolution has been controversial (Lin et al 1999;Kauffmann et al 1996;Totani & Yoshii 1998;Fried et al 2001), and the observational uncertainties are large enough that dynamical number or mass evolution in the early-type galaxy population cannot be ruled out.…”
Section: A Model For Redshift Evv Olution Of the Lens Populationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We use the results from Faber et al (2007) for the evolution of B-band magnitudes from the DEEP2 and COMBO-17 surveys, which is ∆M * B ∼ −1.23 mag per unit redshift (with the sign indicating that galaxies were intrinsically brighter in the past), for a combined sample of blue and red galaxies. Typically, estimates of evolution in the redder bands are less than the estimates of evolution in bluer bands (Lin et al 1999;Blanton et al 2003). Assuming that the evolution is a smooth function of the wavelength, the evolution in I-band should be in between B and K band.…”
Section: Volume-limitingmentioning
confidence: 99%