The CMS barrel calorimeter response to particle beams from 2 to 350 GeV/c

Abdullin, S.; Abramov, V.; Acharya, B. S.; Adam, N.; Adams, M. R.; Adžić, P.; Akchurin, N.; Akgun, U.; Albayrak, E. A.; Alemany–Fernández, R.; Almeida, N.; Anagnostou, G.; Andelin, D.; Anderson, E. W.; Anfreville, M.; Aničin, I.; Antchev, G.; Antunović, Ž.; Arcidiacono, R.; Arenton, M. W.; Auffray, E.; Argirò, S.; Askew, A.; Atramentov, O.; Ayan, S.; Arcidy, M.; Aydin, S.; Aziz, T.; Baarmand, M. M.; Babich, K.; Baccaro, S.; Baden, Drew; Baffioni, S.; Bakirci, M. N.; Balazs, M.; Banerjee, S.; Banerjee, S.; Bard, Robert L.; Barge, D.; Barnes, V. E.; Barney, D.; Barone, L.; Bartoloni, Alessandro; Baty, C.; Bawa, H. S.; Baiatian, G.; Bandurin, D. V.; Beauceron, S.; Bell, K. W.; Bencze, G.; Benetta, R.; Bercher, M.; Beri, S. B.; Bernet, C.; Berntzon, L.; Berthon, U.; Besançon, M.; Betev, B. L.; Beuselinck, R.; Bhatnagar, V.; Bhatti, A.; Biino, C.; Blaha, J.; Bloch, P.; Blyth, S.; Bodek, A.; Bornheim, A.; Böse, S.; Bose, T.; Bourotte, J.; Brett, A. M.; Brown, R. M.; Britton, D.; Budd, H. S.; Buehler, M.; Burchesky, K.; Busson, P.; Camanzi, B.; Camporesi, T.; Cankoçak, K.; Carrell, K.; Carrera, E.; Cartiglia, N.; Cavallari, F.; Çerçi, S.; Cerutti, M.; Chang, P.; Chang, Y. H.; Charlot, C.; Chen, E. A.; Chen, W. T.; Chen, Z.; Chendvankar, S. R.; Chipaux, R.; Choudhary, B. C.; Choudhury, R. K.; Chung, Y. S.; Clarida, W.; Cockerill, D. J. A.; Combaret, C.; Conetti, S.; Cossutti, F.; Cox, B.; Cremaldi, L.; Cushman, P.; Cussans, D.; Dafinei, I.; Damgov, J.; Calafiori, D. R. Da Silva Di; Daskalakis, G.; Davatz, G.; David, A.; Barbaro, P. de; Debbins, P.; Deiters, K.; Déjardin, M.; Djordjevic, M.; Deliomeroglu, M.; Negra, R. Della; Ricca, G. Della; Re, D. Del; Demianov, A. I.; Min, A. De; Denegri, D.; Depasse, P.; Visser, T. De; Descamps, J.; Deshpande, P. V.; Diaz, J. C.; Diemoz, M.; Marco, E. Di; Дімітров, Л.; Dissertori, G.; Dittmar, M.; Djambazov, L.; Dobrzyński, L.; Drndarevic, S.; Duboscq, J. E.; Dugad, S.; Dumanoğlu, I.; Duru, F.; Dutta, D.; Dželalija, M.; Efthymiopoulos, I.; Elias, J. E.; Elliott-Peisert, A.; Mamouni, H. El; Elvira, D.; Emeliantchik, I.; Eno, S.; Ershov, A.; Ertürk, S.; Esen, S.; Eşkut, E.; Evangelou, I.; Evans, D.; Fabbro, B.; Faure, J. L.; Fay, J.; Fenyvesi, A.; Ferri, F.; Fisher, W.; Flower, P.; Franci, D.; Franzoni, G.; Freeman, J.; Freudenreich, K.; Funk, W.; Ganjour, S.; Gargiulo, C.; Gascon, S.; Gataullin, M.; Gaultney, V.; Gamsizkan, H.; Gavrilov, V.; Geerebaert, Y.; Genchev, V.; Gentit, F. X.; Gerbaudo, D.; Gershtein, Y.; Ghezzi, A.; Ghodgaonkar, M.; Gilly, J.; Givernaud, A.; Gleyzer, S. V.; Gninenko, S.; Go, Alan S.; Gobbo, B.; Godinović, N.; Голубев, Н.; Golutvin, I.; Goncharov, P. I.; Gong, D. T.; Govoni, P.; Grant, N.; Gras, P.; Grassi, T.; Green, D.; Greenhalgh, R. J. S.; Gribushin, A.; Гринев, Б. В.; Riveros, L. Guevara; Guillaud, J.P.; Gurtu, A.; Guler, A. M.; Gülmez, E.; Gümüş, Kazım; Haelen, T.; Hagopian, S.; Hagopian, V.; Haguenauer, M.; Halyo, V.; Monchenault, G. Hamel de; Hansen, Maxwell T.; Hashemi, M.; Hauptman, J. M.; Hazen, E.; Heath, H. F.; Heering, A.; Heister, A.; Heltsley, B. K.; Hill, John; Hintz, W.; Hirosky, R.; Hobson, P. R.; Honma, A.; Hou, George Wei-Shu; Hsiung, Y.; Hunt, Adrian P.; Husejko, M.; Ille, B.; Ilyina, N. P.; Imlay, R.; Ingram, D.; Ingram, Q.; Isiksal, E.; Jarry, P.; Jarvis, C.; Jeong, C.; Jessop, C. P.; Johnson, K. F.; Jones, J.; Jovanovic, D.; Kaadze, K.; Качанов, В.; Kaftanov, V.; Kailas, S.; Kalagin, V.; Kalinin, A.; Kalmani, S.D.; Karmgard, Daniel John; Kataria, S. K.; Kaur, M.; Kaya, M.; Kaya, O.; Topaksu, A. Kayis; Kellogg, R. G.; Kennedy, B. W.; Khmelnikov, A.; Kim, H.; Kisselevich, I.; Kloukinas, K.; Kodolova, O.; Kohli, J. M.; Kokkas, P.; Kolberg, T.; Kolossov, V.; Korablev, A.; Korneev, Yu. P.; Kosarev, I.; Kramer, L.; Krasnikov, N.; Krinitsyn, A. N.; Krokhotin, A.; Krpić, D.; Kryshkin, V. I.; Kubota, Y.; Kubrik, A.; Kuleshov, S.; Kumar, Ajay; Kumar, P.; Kunori, S.; Kuo, C. M.; Kurt, P.; Kyberd, P.; Kyriakis, A.; Laasanen, A. T.; Ladygin, V. P.; Laird, E.; Landsberg, G.; László, Á.; Lawlor, C.; Lazic, D.; Lebeau, M.; Lecomte, P.; Lecoq, P.; Ledovskoy, A.; Lee, S.-W.; Leshev, G.; Lethuillier, M.; Levchuk, L.; Lin, S. W.; Lin, W.; Linn, S.; Lintern, A.L.; Litvine, V.; Litvintsev, D. O.; Litov, L.; Lobolo, L.; Locci, E.; Lodge, A. B.; Longo, E.; Loukas, D.; Łoś, S.; Lubinsky, V.; Luckey, P. D.; Lukanin, V.; Lustermann, W.; Lynch, C.; Ma, Y.; Machado, E.; Mahlke-Krueger, H.; Maity, M.; Majumder, G.; Malberti, M.; Malclès, J.; Maletić, D.; Mandjavidze, I.; Mans, J.; Manthos, N.; Maravin, Y.; Marchica, C.; Marinelli, N.; Μάρκου, Α.; Markou, C.; Marlow, D.; Markowitz, P.; Marone, M.; Martı́nez, G.; Mathez, H.; Matveev, V.; Mavrommatis, C.; Maurelli, G.; Mazumdar, K.; Meridiani, P.; Merlo, J.-P.; Mermerkaya, H.; Mescheryakov, G.; Mestvirishvili, A.; Mikhaĭlin, V. V.; Milenović, P.; Miller, M.; Milleret, G.; Miné, P.; Moeller, A.; Mohammadi-Najafabadi, M.; Mohanty, A. K.; Moissenz, P.; Mondal, N. K.; Moortgat, F.; Mossolov, V.; Mur, Marieke; Musella, P.; Musienko, Y.; Nagaraj, P.; Nardulli, A.; Nash, J.; Nédélec, P.; Negri, P.; Newman, H. B.; Nikitenko, A.; Norbeck, E.; Nessi‐Tedaldi, F.; Obertino, M. M.; Olson, J.; Onel, Y.; Önengüt, G.; Organtini, G.; Orimoto, T.; Ozkan, Cengiz S.; Özkurt, Halil; Özkorucuklu, S.; Özok, F.; Paganoni, M.; Paganini, P.; Paktinat, S.; Paĺ, A. F.; Palma, A.; Panev, B.; Pant, L. M.; Papadakis, A.; Papadakis, I. E.; Papadopoulos, I.; Paramatti, R.; Parracho, P.; Pastrone, N.; Patil, M.; Patterson, J. R.; Pauß, F.; Penzo, A.; Petrakou, E.; Petrushanko, Sergey; Petrosyan, A.; Phillips, D. G.; Pikalov, V.; Piperov, S.; Piroué, P.; Podrasky, V.; Polatoz, A.; Pompoš, A.; Popescu, S.; Posch, C.; Pozdnyakov, A.; Ptochos, F.; Puljak, I.; Pullia, A.; Punz, T.; Puzović, J.; Qian, Wei; Ragazzi, S.; Rahatlou, S.; Ralich, R.; Rande, J.; Razis, P. A.; Redaelli, N.; Reddy, L.V.; Reidy, J.; Renker, D.; Reucroft, S.; Reymond, J. M.; Ribeiro, Pedro; Roeser, U.; Rogalev, E.; Rogan, C.; Roh, Y.; Rohlf, J.; Romanteau, T.; Rondeaux, F.; Ronquest, M.; Ronzhin, A.; Rosowsky, A.; Rovelli, Carlo; Ruchti, R.; Rumerio, P.; Rusack, R.; Rusakov, S. V.; Ryan, M. J.; Ryazanov, A.; Safronov, G.; Sala, L.; Salerno, R.; Sanders, D. A.; Santanastasio, F.; Sanzeni, C.; Sarycheva, L.; Satyanarayana, B.; Schinzel, D.; Schmidt, Iván; Seez, C.; Sekmen, S.; Semenov, S.; Senchishin, V.; Sergeyev, Sergey; Serin, M.; Sever, R.; Sharp, P.; Shepherd-Themistocleous, C. H.; Siamitros, C.; Sillou, D.; Singh, J. B.; Singovsky, A.; Sirois, Y.; Sirunyan, A. M.; Silva, J.; Silva, P.; Skuja, A.; Sharma, S.; Sherwood, B.; Shiu, J. G.; Shivpuri, R. K.; Shukla, P.; Shumeiko, N.; Smirnov, Vladimir A.; Smith, Brett; Smith, V. J.; Sogut, K.; Sönmez, N.; Sorokin, P.; Spezziga, M.; Sproston, M.; Stefanovich, R.; Stöckli, F.; Stolin, V.; Sudhakar, K.; Sulak, L.; Suter, H.; Suzuki, I.; Swain, J.; Fatis, T. Tabarelli de; Talov, V. V.; Takahashi, Masashi; Tcheremoukhine, A.; Teller, O.; Teplov, K.; Theofilatos, K.; Thiebaux, Ch; Thomas, R.; Timciuc, V.; Timlin, C.; Titov, M.; Tobías, Aurelio; Tonwar, S. C.; Topakli, H.; Topkar, A.; Triantis, F. A.; Troshin, S.; Tully, C.; Turchanovich, L.K.; Tyurin, N.; Ueno, K.; Ulyanov, A.; Uzunian, A.; Vanini, A.; Vankov, I.; Vardanyan, I.; Varela, Fernando; Varela, José Arana; Vasil’ev, A. N.; Velasco, M.; Vergili, M.; Verma, Prabal Singh; Verrecchia, P.; Vesztergombi, G.; Veverka, J.; Vichoudis, P.; Vidal, R.; Virdee, T.; Vishnevskiy, A.; Vlassov, E.; Vodopiyanov, I.; Volobouev, I.; Волков, А. А.; Volodko, A.; Gunten, H. P. Von; Wang, L.; Wang, M.; Wardrope, D. R.; Weber, Martin; Weng, J.; Werner, John S.; Wetstein, M.; Winn, D.; Wigmans, R.; Williams, J. H.; Whitmore, J.; Won, S.; Wu, S.; Yang, Y.; Yaselli, I.; Yazgan, E.; Yetkin, T.; Yohay, R.; Zabi, A.; Zalán, P.; Zamiatin, N.; Zarubin, A.; Zelepoukine, S.; Zeyrek, M.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, L. Y.; Zhu, K.

doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-009-0959-5

Cited by 36 publications

(23 citation statements)

References 11 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The response to π + is greater on average than the response to π − at low energy, which agrees with Ref. [32], where the difference is attributed to a charge-exchange effect (i.e. the production of additional neutral pions in showers initiated by π + ).…”

Section: Differences In Calorimeter Response Between Particles Of Difsupporting

confidence: 91%

A measurement of the calorimeter response to single hadrons and determination of the jet energy scale uncertainty using LHC Run-1 pp-collision data with the ATLAS detector

Aaboud¹,

Barnovska-Blenessy²,

Berger³

et al. 2017

Eur. Phys. J. C

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A measurement of the calorimeter response to isolated charged hadrons in the ATLAS detector at the LHC is presented. This measurement is performed with 3.2 nb of proton–proton collision data at from 2010 and 0.1 nb of data at from 2012. A number of aspects of the calorimeter response to isolated hadrons are explored. After accounting for energy deposited by neutral particles, there is a 5% discrepancy in the modelling, using various sets of Geant4 hadronic physics models, of the calorimeter response to isolated charged hadrons in the central calorimeter region. The description of the response to anti-protons at low momenta is found to be improved with respect to previous analyses. The electromagnetic and hadronic calorimeters are also examined separately, and the detector simulation is found to describe the response in the hadronic calorimeter well. The jet energy scale uncertainty and correlations in scale between jets of different momenta and pseudorapidity are derived based on these studies. The uncertainty is 2–5% for jets with transverse momenta above 2 , where this method provides the jet energy scale uncertainty for ATLAS.

show abstract

Section: Differences In Calorimeter Response Between Particles Of Difsupporting

confidence: 91%

A measurement of the calorimeter response to single hadrons and determination of the jet energy scale uncertainty using LHC Run-1 pp-collision data with the ATLAS detector

Aaboud¹,

Barnovska-Blenessy²,

Berger³

et al. 2017

Eur. Phys. J. C

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The Pixel Tracker readout system is described in detail in [6]. A single pixel barrel module is readout by 16 Read-Out Chips (ROCs).…”

Section: Tracker Control and Readout Schemementioning

confidence: 99%

“…A calorimeter is said to be compensating [85] if R h = R γ , and non-compensating if R h < R γ . The CMS calorimeters are strongly non-compensating: the CMS HCAL has been measured [6] to have R h /R γ ≈ 0.7, and for the crystal ECAL lower values, of the order of 0.45-0.5, are assumed.…”

Section: Jet Reconstruction 35mentioning

confidence: 99%

Search for the Standard Model Higgs Boson in the H → ZZ → l + l - qq Decay Channel at CMS

Pandolfi

2013

Springer Theses

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…In the forward region, the granularity is further improved by the preshower detector (ES) 1.65 < |η| < 2.6 which consists of 2 orthogonal planes of silicon strips. Further information about the ECAL can be found in [2][3][4][5][6].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The CMS HCAL contains 9072 readout channels organized into four subsystems: barrel (HB, 2592 channels), endcap (HE, 2592 channels), outer (HO, 2160 channels) and forward (HF, 1728 channels). The performance of the HB, HE, HO, and HF were also extensively investigated and are reported in [2,[6][7][8][9].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

CMS forward calorimeters Phase II Upgrade

Bilki

2014

2014 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference (NSS/MIC)

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The Phase II Upgrade of the CMS forward calorimeters (electromagnetic and hadronic) originates from the fact that these calorimeters will not be sufficiently performant with the expected HL-LHC (High Luminosity LHC) conditions. The major challenge is to preserve/improve the high performance of the current forward detectors with new devices that can withstand the unprecedented radiation levels and disentangle the very large event pileup. Here, we present an overview of the various upgrade options being considered by CMS, explaining the detector concepts and current/future beam test activities.Presented at CALOR2014 16th Int. Conf. on Calorimetry for High-Energy Physics CMS Forward Calorimeters Phase II Upgrade B BilkiOn behalf of the CMS Collaboration University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, IL 60439, USA E-mail: burak-bilki@uiowa.edu Abstract. The Phase II Upgrade of the CMS forward calorimeters (electromagnetic and hadronic) originates from the fact that these calorimeters will not be sufficiently performant with the expected HL-LHC (High Luminosity LHC) conditions. The major challenge is to preserve/improve the high performance of the current forward detectors with new devices that can withstand the unprecedented radiation levels and disentangle the very large event pileup. Here, we present an overview of the various upgrade options being considered by CMS, explaining the detector concepts and current/future beam test activities.

show abstract

The CMS barrel calorimeter response to particle beams from 2 to 350 GeV/c

Cited by 36 publications

References 11 publications

A measurement of the calorimeter response to single hadrons and determination of the jet energy scale uncertainty using LHC Run-1 pp-collision data with the ATLAS detector

A measurement of the calorimeter response to single hadrons and determination of the jet energy scale uncertainty using LHC Run-1 pp-collision data with the ATLAS detector

Search for the Standard Model Higgs Boson in the H → ZZ → l + l - qq Decay Channel at CMS

CMS forward calorimeters Phase II Upgrade

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About