2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.pnucene.2005.05.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The closed on-site fuel cycle of the brest reactors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For simplicity, let effective fraction of delayed neutrons be the same for all the fast reactor models under consideration here, ( 235 U) = 0.0065. The curves presented in Figure 1 demonstrate dependencies of the reactivity jump required to provide the 2 International Journal of Nuclear Energy power excursion with asymptotic time period (without any feedback effects) in the fourth-generation lead-cooled, fast BREST-type [8] reactor (neutron reflector-50 cm thick natural lead), in thermal VVER-type and CANDU-type reactors as well as in two hypothetical reactors whose prompt neutron lifetimes are equal to 0.01 s and 0.1 s, respectively.…”
Section: Prompt Neutron Lifetime Of Different Reactorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For simplicity, let effective fraction of delayed neutrons be the same for all the fast reactor models under consideration here, ( 235 U) = 0.0065. The curves presented in Figure 1 demonstrate dependencies of the reactivity jump required to provide the 2 International Journal of Nuclear Energy power excursion with asymptotic time period (without any feedback effects) in the fourth-generation lead-cooled, fast BREST-type [8] reactor (neutron reflector-50 cm thick natural lead), in thermal VVER-type and CANDU-type reactors as well as in two hypothetical reactors whose prompt neutron lifetimes are equal to 0.01 s and 0.1 s, respectively.…”
Section: Prompt Neutron Lifetime Of Different Reactorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some different approaches with multiple-recycle fuel cycles for fast reactors, which could provide radically higher aggregate combustion percentages, should be mentioned here (Orlov et al. 2005; Moiseenko et al. 2012; Ternovykha et al.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%