2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.febslet.2015.10.014
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The closed conformation of the LDL receptor is destabilized by the low Ca++ concentration but favored by the high Mg++ concentration in the endosome

Abstract: a b s t r a c tThe LDL receptor (LDLR) internalizes LDL and VLDL particles. In the endosomes, it adopts a closed conformation important for recycling, by interaction of two modules of the ligand binding domain (LR4-5) and a b-propeller motif. Here, we investigate by SPR the interactions between those two modules and the b-propeller. Our results indicate that the two modules cooperate to bind the bpropeller. The binding is favored by low pH and by high [Ca ++ ]. Our data show that Mg ++ , at high concentration… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Upon titration with EDTA, the proteins coexpressed with RAP exhibited disappearance of the band at ∼230 nm and a more significant change of the CD intensity at ∼200 nm than the counterpart proteins, which indicate that the ordered CR domains better retain Ca 2+ ( Table 1 ). These results are consistent with general improvement of binding properties of proteins coexpressed with RAP by SPR in our study, and data of a previous study showed that higher content of Ca 2+ in LDLR favored its binding properties ( 56 ). Thus, coexpression of the proteins with RAP improved their yields and properties.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Upon titration with EDTA, the proteins coexpressed with RAP exhibited disappearance of the band at ∼230 nm and a more significant change of the CD intensity at ∼200 nm than the counterpart proteins, which indicate that the ordered CR domains better retain Ca 2+ ( Table 1 ). These results are consistent with general improvement of binding properties of proteins coexpressed with RAP by SPR in our study, and data of a previous study showed that higher content of Ca 2+ in LDLR favored its binding properties ( 56 ). Thus, coexpression of the proteins with RAP improved their yields and properties.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…In this state, the LBD folds back onto the β-propeller, forming a loop-like structure with LBD 4 and 5 bound to the β-propeller (Rudenko et al, 2002). This conformational shift allows LDLR to release LDL-C particles for degradation before the receptor is recycled back to the cell membrane (Martínez-Oliván et al, 2015;Tveten et al, 2012). The structural flexibility of the LBD regions largely plays a major role in LDLR adopting an open conformation on the cell membrane and a closed conformation in hepatocytes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both CD320 and LDLR contain LDLR‐A1 and LDLR‐A2 ligand‐binding domains 71,78,79 . However, the selectivity and affinity of CD320 and LDLR are very different: CD320 has the Cbl/TCN2 complex as its only natural ligand, whereas LDLR binds LDL but is not known to bind Cbl/TCN2.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%