1967
DOI: 10.1101/sqb.1967.032.01.063
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Clonal Selection Hypothesis Evaluated by Grafted Cells Reacting Against their Hosts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
47
1

Year Published

1968
1968
1995
1995

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 119 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
4
47
1
Order By: Relevance
“…2 and 3), indicating that the generation of killer cells is not a single cell event; the fact that the average intercept was only slightly higher than 1.0, we take to indicate that the other cell types required are present in higher frequency than the limiting unit, of which only one cell is required. From earlier estimates, it appears that precursors of proliferating cells are present in 10-to 100-fold higher frequencies than the limiting unit measured here (1)(2)(3)(4)(5), and indeed we had direct evidence in the strongest combinations that proliferation was not the limiting factor (Table III). Some of the nonspecific cells may have been provided by the many stimulating cells, and seeing how the frequencies determined depend on the haplotype combination and on the antigenic differences (Figs.…”
Section: Assessments Of Proliferation and Cytotoxicmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…2 and 3), indicating that the generation of killer cells is not a single cell event; the fact that the average intercept was only slightly higher than 1.0, we take to indicate that the other cell types required are present in higher frequency than the limiting unit, of which only one cell is required. From earlier estimates, it appears that precursors of proliferating cells are present in 10-to 100-fold higher frequencies than the limiting unit measured here (1)(2)(3)(4)(5), and indeed we had direct evidence in the strongest combinations that proliferation was not the limiting factor (Table III). Some of the nonspecific cells may have been provided by the many stimulating cells, and seeing how the frequencies determined depend on the haplotype combination and on the antigenic differences (Figs.…”
Section: Assessments Of Proliferation and Cytotoxicmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…Making use of the strong histocompatibility H-2 system of mice, Simonsen has shown that deliberate sensitization of cell donors against prospective host antigens does not invariably increase GVH immunologic reactivity of subsequently transferred cells. This finding has been interpreted to indicate that the size of the clone of reactive cells in a normal donor against a particular histocompatibility antigen system is already so large that deliberate immunization does not significantly increase its size (5).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Studies comparing the reactivity of normal and alloimmune lymphoid cells, as assessed by a graft-vs, host assay in vivo (13) or by a proliferative assay in vitro (14) were unable to detect significant differences between the two cell populations. On the other hand, skin grafts appear to be rejected more rapidly by specifically alloimmune hosts (15), and a more rapid and quantitatively greater generation of specific CTL has been observed in the spleens of mice twice immunized with allogeneic tumor cells (4).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recently, using improved culture conditions identical to those described in this report, we have found that the generation of CTL in MLC may be increased approximately fivefold when the responding spleen cells are taken from alloimmune mice (5). However, since the primary response to alloantigens appears to involve a relatively large number of cells (13,14), it is difficult in each of these model systems to compare the secondary response in the absence of a strong concomitant primary response.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%