2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.brat.2008.12.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The clock as a focus of selective attention in those with primary insomnia: An experimental study using a modified Posner paradigm

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
36
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
4
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[20][21][22][23][24][25][26] The majority of this work supports the notion that poor sleepers show an attentional bias for sleep-related stimuli relative to good sleeper controls. Consistent with these results, altered emotional responses to sleep-related stimuli have been reported in people with insomnia as compared to good sleepers.…”
supporting
confidence: 79%
“…[20][21][22][23][24][25][26] The majority of this work supports the notion that poor sleepers show an attentional bias for sleep-related stimuli relative to good sleeper controls. Consistent with these results, altered emotional responses to sleep-related stimuli have been reported in people with insomnia as compared to good sleepers.…”
supporting
confidence: 79%
“…Out of the 13 studies, 10 adopted a single attentional bias paradigm: four studies used the emotional Stroop (Barclay & Ellis 2013;Lundh et al, 1997;Sagaspe et al, 2006;Taylor, Espie, & White, 2003), three used the dot-probe (Jansson-Fröjmark, Bermås, & Kjellén, 2012;Richardson, Gradisar, & Pulford, 2014), two used the induced change blindness (Flicker) paradigm (Jones, Macphee, Broomfield, Jones, & Espie, 2005;Marchetti, Biello, Broomfield, MacMahon, & Espie, 2006), and one used the posner paradigm (Woods, Marchetti, Biello, and Espie, 2009) [see Table 1 for a description of each task]. Three out of the 13 studies used a combination of two attentional bias tasks: two studies used an emotional Stroop, and a mixed modality (visual-auditory) task (Spiegelhalder, Espie, Nissen, & Riemann, 2008;Spiegelhalder, Espie, & Riemann, 2009), and one study used both emotional Stroop and dot-probe tasks (Spiegelhalder et al, 2010).…”
Section: Task Typementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fast RTs on valid trials suggest enhanced engagement with the cue stimulus, whereas longer RTs on invalid trials indicate delayed disengagement from the stimulus. Woods et al, 2009) -PSQI for sleep quality (mean score = 4.4). SSS to assess sleepiness level (mean score = 2.7).…”
Section: Posnermentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…)。但部分研究并未发现失眠患者在执行功能上的受损 (Orff, Drummond, Nowakowski, Perlis, 2007;Shekleton et al, 2010;Ferreira & de Almondes, 2014), 这和失眠患者存在前额叶皮层 结构和功能改变的神经成像结果不符 (Joo et al, 2013;Spiegelhalder, Regen, Baglioni, Riemann, Winkelman, 2013;Nofzinger et al, 2004),因为前额叶是参与执行功能、抑制控制的关键脑区 (Smith & Jonides, 1999;Miller & Cohen, 2001;Kane & Engle, 2002 (Logan & Cowan, 1984),根据意识状 态可以分为自动抑制和有意抑制 (Nigg, 2000)。但多数研究者将抑制控制分为冲突抑制和反应抑制 (Booth et al, 2004;Aron, Robbins, & Poldrack, 2004;Brydges et al, 2012;Diamond, 2013) (Lundh, Froding, Gyllenhammar, Broman, & Hetta, 1997;Taylor, Espie, & White, 2003;MacMahon et al, 2006;Marchetti et al, 2006;Spiegelhalder, Espie, Nissen, & Riemann, 2008;Woods et al 2009;Spiegelhalder et al, 2010;Baglioni et al, 2010;Barclay & Ellis, 2013;Jansson-Fröjmark et al, 2013);仅有两篇研究探讨反应抑制能力,但结果存在分歧 (Sagaspe, Philip, & Schwartz, 2007;Covassin et al, 2011) Figure 1. The simplified model contrast between brain areas and its connectivity in insomnia disorder and healthy good sleepers when performing inhibitory control tasks (Brain regions referred to Depue, Orr et al 2015).…”
Section: 引言mentioning
confidence: 99%