1979
DOI: 10.3758/bf03205664
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The CLIPR remote laboratory microprocessor system: Development and applications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1981
1981
1981
1981

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Third, the larger the system, the greater the number of programs available in libraries, and the easier is the programming compared with a stand-alone system. If a free (or cheap) timesharing computer is unavailable, the interface can be connected easily to a standalone microcomputer such as a Terak or Apple and Bailey, Ward, Spear, Leatherman, Waite, & Christian, 1979;Fox, Ward, & Lesgold, 1979). However, as yet, transportable systems have not been developed (see Friendly & Franklin, 1979, for additional discussion of such designs).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Third, the larger the system, the greater the number of programs available in libraries, and the easier is the programming compared with a stand-alone system. If a free (or cheap) timesharing computer is unavailable, the interface can be connected easily to a standalone microcomputer such as a Terak or Apple and Bailey, Ward, Spear, Leatherman, Waite, & Christian, 1979;Fox, Ward, & Lesgold, 1979). However, as yet, transportable systems have not been developed (see Friendly & Franklin, 1979, for additional discussion of such designs).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Papers from this conference have often been helpful in illustrating the functioning of in-place laboratory systems that may be duplicated by others (e.g., Bailey, Ward, Spear, Leatherman, Waite, & Christian, 1979;Crossman & Williams, 1978;Santa & Streit, 1978; these are but a few of the many helpful papers). Some of us have learned first-hand, however, that duplication of other people's computer laboratories may neither satisfy our current objectives nor permit even the satisfaction of a modest set of foreseeable objectives.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%