The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2021
DOI: 10.1016/s0090-8258(21)01200-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The clinical utility of the Khorana score in determining risk for venous thromboembolism in patients with gynecologic cancer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The patients with KS ≥ 3 (high-risk) had a VTE incidence of 30%, while the ones with KS = 1–2 (intermediate risk) had a disease incidence of 10%, which is somewhat comparable to the results of a previous study among patients with gynaecological tumours 45 . Also following the literature, the original cut-off score (≥ 3) seems to be more appropriate to determine VTE risk among these patients 46 . Although out of the scope of this study, KS ≥ 3 was found to predict a worse prognosis (≥ 3 vs. < 3, log-rank test, P = 0.046).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The patients with KS ≥ 3 (high-risk) had a VTE incidence of 30%, while the ones with KS = 1–2 (intermediate risk) had a disease incidence of 10%, which is somewhat comparable to the results of a previous study among patients with gynaecological tumours 45 . Also following the literature, the original cut-off score (≥ 3) seems to be more appropriate to determine VTE risk among these patients 46 . Although out of the scope of this study, KS ≥ 3 was found to predict a worse prognosis (≥ 3 vs. < 3, log-rank test, P = 0.046).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%