2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2018.08.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Clinical Sequencing Evidence-Generating Research Consortium: Integrating Genomic Sequencing in Diverse and Medically Underserved Populations

Abstract: The Clinical Sequencing Evidence-Generating Research (CSER) consortium, now in its second funding cycle, is investigating the effectiveness of integrating genomic (exome or genome) sequencing into the clinical care of diverse and medically underserved individuals in a variety of healthcare settings and disease states. The consortium comprises a coordinating center, six funded extramural clinical projects, and an ongoing National Human Genome Research Institute (NHGRI) intramural project. Collectively, these pr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
117
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 132 publications
(121 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
1
117
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Future assessments of patients having cancer genetic testing should include tracking patient outcomes following results disclosure to contribute clinical utility evidence. Of note, the current phase of the Clinical Sequencing Evidence‐Generating Research (CSER) consortium includes a clinical project providing hereditary cancer panel genetic testing and is focused in part on the clinical utility of genomic sequencing, and exploring medical follow up and cascade testing of relatives (Amendola et al, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Future assessments of patients having cancer genetic testing should include tracking patient outcomes following results disclosure to contribute clinical utility evidence. Of note, the current phase of the Clinical Sequencing Evidence‐Generating Research (CSER) consortium includes a clinical project providing hereditary cancer panel genetic testing and is focused in part on the clinical utility of genomic sequencing, and exploring medical follow up and cascade testing of relatives (Amendola et al, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To maximize the diversity of samples and sites used for evaluation, other trios in the cohort were used to compute Mendelian violation rates (with the sole exception being the three person HG002-HG003-HG004 cohort) and the children of GIAB trios were excluded from the GIAB metrics calculations. The second data source is the Clinical Sequencing Evidence-Generating Research (CSER) consortium 26 , which contains 929 WGS and 344 WES samples, including 249 WGS trios and 112 WES trios. The third data source is the Population Architecture using Genomics and Epidemiology (PAGE) consortium 27 , which contains 313 WGS.…”
Section: Cohorts Used In Development and Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the advent of large, population-based DNA biobanks in health systems, new opportunities are available to characterize the links between demography and a broad range of health outcomes [3][4][5][6][7] . Knowledge about genetic variation shared across human populations can aid in understanding the demographic events that might impact disease burden across populations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%