2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.paid.2014.01.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Clinical Perfectionism Questionnaire: Further evidence for two factors capturing perfectionistic strivings and concerns

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

22
72
5

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(99 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
22
72
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Recent studies have demonstrated the CPQ to comprise of two factors; personal standards and emotional concerns and consequences (e.g., Dickie et al, 2012;Stoeber & Damian, 2014). The current study also tested the reliability of the two dimensional CPQ, however, both subscales recorded below the recommended level, achieving .53 for personal standards and .55 for emotional concerns and consequences.…”
Section: Figmentioning
confidence: 71%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Recent studies have demonstrated the CPQ to comprise of two factors; personal standards and emotional concerns and consequences (e.g., Dickie et al, 2012;Stoeber & Damian, 2014). The current study also tested the reliability of the two dimensional CPQ, however, both subscales recorded below the recommended level, achieving .53 for personal standards and .55 for emotional concerns and consequences.…”
Section: Figmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…Derived from this definition, a number of psychometric measures have been developed and utilized in research such as Frost et al's (1990) Multidimensional Perfectionism Scale (FMPS) and Hewitt and Flett's (1991) Multidimensional Perfectionism Scale (HFMPS). Accordingly, perfectionism is frequently depicted as a multi-faceted personality disposition, delineated by the two higher order dimensions of personal standards perfectionism and evaluative concerns/self-critical perfectionism (e.g., Dickie, Surgenor, Wilson, & McDowall, 2012;Stoeber & Damian, 2014). Research examining the link between these two higher order dimensions and eating psychopathology is plentiful within clinical and community settings (e.g., Bento et al, 2010;Shafran, Lee, Payne, & Fairburn, 2006), with a growing http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2014.09.047 0191-8869/Ó 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.…”
Section: Multidimensional Perfectionism and Eating Disorders In The Gmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In response to such associations, Shafran and colleagues (2002) proposed a cognitive-behavioural theory of ''clinical perfectionism,'' which they defined as overvaluing the importance of striving to meet standards and reacting to perceived failure to meet standards with self-criticism. Although these two aspects of clinical perfectionism conceptually correspond to the two higher order perfectionism constructs of personal standards and evaluative concerns, respectively (e.g., Dunkley et al, 2006;Stoeber & Damian, 2014), Shafran and colleagues (2002) conceptualized clinical perfectionism as a unidimensional construct. We contend that, akin to the notion that perfectionism is a single general factor (e.g., Egan et al, 2016;Smith & Saklofske, 2017), clinical perfectionism is best understood as a single factor that reflects an overreaching desire to meet high standards and self-criticism in response to failing to meet those standards.…”
Section: Perfectionism and Disordered Gamblingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Factor analyses of measures based on unidimensional conceptualizations (e.g., Clinical Perfectionism Questionnaire; Fairburn, Cooper, & Shafran, 2003) reveal two correlated, but empirically distinct perfectionism factors of personal standards and self-evaluation. Multiple studies have found support for the correlation between these two factors ( r = .39 & r = .37; Dickie, Surgenor, Wilson, & McDowall, 2012;Stoeber & Damian, 2014). Labels vary, but two dimensions (strivings or standards and maladaptive evaluation or perfectionistic concerns) also often emerge in factor analyses based on multidimensional measures of perfectionism and appear to be differentially related to a variety of outcomes (e.g., Dunkley, Blankstein, Halsall, Williams, & Winkworth, 2000;Stoeber & Otto, 2006).…”
Section: Definitional and Measurement Considerations For Perfectionismmentioning
confidence: 99%