2003
DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0447.107.s416.5.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Clinical Global Impression–Schizophrenia scale: a simple instrument to measure the diversity of symptoms present in schizophrenia

Abstract: Objective:  To describe the development and validation of the Clinical Global Impression–Schizophrenia (CGI‐SCH) scale, designed to assess positive, negative, depressive and cognitive symptoms in schizophrenia. Method:  The CGI‐SCH scale was adapted from the CGI scale. Concurrent validity and sensitivity to change were assessed by comparison with the Positive and Negative Symptom Severity (PANSS) and Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF) scales. To evaluate inter‐rater reliability, all patients were assessed … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
387
0
12

Year Published

2006
2006
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 538 publications
(400 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
387
0
12
Order By: Relevance
“…Clinical severity was assessed using the Clinical Global Impression-Schizophrenia scale (CGI-SCH) (Haro et al, 2003c), which evaluated positive, negative, cognitive, depressive and overall symptoms in the week before the day of assessment. This physician-rated scale ranges from 1 (not ill) to 7 (among the most severely ill).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Clinical severity was assessed using the Clinical Global Impression-Schizophrenia scale (CGI-SCH) (Haro et al, 2003c), which evaluated positive, negative, cognitive, depressive and overall symptoms in the week before the day of assessment. This physician-rated scale ranges from 1 (not ill) to 7 (among the most severely ill).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further details about the design of the SOHO study and the results at 6 months and 3 years have been provided elsewhere (Haro et al, 2003a;2003b;2003c;Haro et al, 2005;Haro et al, 2006).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All participants were administered the following clinical scales : MINI (Sheehan et al 1998) ; YBOCS (Goodman et al 1989a, b) ; Clinical Global Impression Scale for schizophrenia (CGI-Sch ; Haro et al 2003) ; Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS ; Sheehan et al 1996) and the Montgomery-Å sberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS ; Montgomery & Å sberg, 1979).…”
Section: Clinical Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The CGI-SCH is not a gold standard and there is no evidence that the CGI-SCH has perfect linearity; this was merely an assumption to allow modification of the BPRS under a determinate condition. For the CGI-SCH, only a certain degree of reliability has been reported [3,22,23]. Nonetheless, we thought that this kind of simplification was unavoidable and the trade-off necessary, even if this assumption would sacrifice rigor to some extent in exchange for examining the degree of an abstract value such as "linearity".…”
Section: Figure 5 An Example Of a Potential Modified 18-item Bprs Mmentioning
confidence: 99%