2009
DOI: 10.3310/hta13520
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The clinical effectiveness of glucosamine and chondroitin supplements in slowing or arresting progression of osteoarthritis of the knee: a systematic review and economic evaluation

Abstract: This monograph may be freely reproduced for the purposes of private research and study and may be included in professional journals provided that suitable acknowledgement is made and the reproduction is not associated with any form of advertising.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
100
0
3

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 152 publications
(105 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
2
100
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…This is significant in the two individual 3-year trials [Reginster et al 2001;Pavelka et al 2002], and when they are pooled in the Cochrane Review [Towheed et al 2009], or in a recent UK Health Technology Assessment (HTA) [Black et al 2009]. Both trials indicated that in mild disease with an initial joint space width of approximately 4 mm, the placebo group loses around 0.1 mm/year and this is prevented by crystalline glucosamine sulfate 1500 mg once daily.…”
Section: Efficacymentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is significant in the two individual 3-year trials [Reginster et al 2001;Pavelka et al 2002], and when they are pooled in the Cochrane Review [Towheed et al 2009], or in a recent UK Health Technology Assessment (HTA) [Black et al 2009]. Both trials indicated that in mild disease with an initial joint space width of approximately 4 mm, the placebo group loses around 0.1 mm/year and this is prevented by crystalline glucosamine sulfate 1500 mg once daily.…”
Section: Efficacymentioning
confidence: 97%
“…This was actually the 2-year extension of the GAIT study [Sawitzke et al 2008], the poor quality of which is explained in the HTA report by the fact that it included only a subset of patients from the original 6-month study [Clegg et al 2006], several patients (over 40%) were excluded from the analysis, there was no intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis with failure to describe appropriately withdrawn patients and, finally, baseline characteristics were unbalanced between groups [Black et al 2009]. This extension of GAIT was indeed a small study in which, despite use of the wrong salt (glucosamine hydrochloride instead of sulfate), at the wrong dose (500 mg three times daily versus 1500 mg once daily), the only results close to a statistically significant difference with placebo were indeed the JSN sparing effect in the glucosamine group, while celecoxib, chondroitin, or a combination of the latter with glucosamine, were completely inactive [Sawitzke et al 2008].…”
Section: Efficacymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…287 A burden-of-illness study with a broad utility decrement for cancer was identified and used to define utility decrements for breast and colon cancer. 304 A utility decrement for osteoarthritis was taken from a HTA, 305 and a utility decrement for depression was calculated from a trial that had used the EQ-5D. 306 The multiplicative utility factors that are used in the model to describe health utility decrements from comorbid complications are shown in Table 46.…”
Section: Utility Decrementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Methylation patterns, although generally stable throughout the genome, are responsive to pharmacologic intervention. One common medication that appears to act through epigenetic mechanisms is glucosamine [169]. In arthritis models, it has been demonstrated that glucosamine prevents demethylation of the IL-1b gene promoter, thereby decreasing expression of this cytokine.…”
Section: Intervention: Dna Methylationmentioning
confidence: 99%