2016
DOI: 10.2967/jnmt.116.174557
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Clinical Dilemma of Incidental Findings on the Low-Resolution CT Images from SPECT/CT MPI Studies

Abstract: CE credit: For CE credit, you can access the test for this article, as well as additional JNMT CE tests, online at https://www.snmmilearningcenter.org. Complete the test online no later than September 2019. Your online test will be scored immediately. You may make 3 attempts to pass the test and must answer 80% of the questions correctly to receive 1.0 CEH (Continuing Education Hour) credit. SNMMI members will have their CEH credit added to their VOICE transcript automatically; nonmembers will be able to print… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Firstly, they are best avoided during pregnancy due to the excessive radiation and risk of harming the foetus [26]. In addition, over-scanning patients with suspected COVID-19 can increase the risk of incidental imaging findings and an unnecessary financial burden on the healthcare system [27]. Furthermore, the use of CT-scans for suspected cases is not practical since SARS-CoV-2 has a relatively high transmission rate; each CT machine needs to be sterilised after use, which can waste time and resources as well as overworking the radiology department in times of need and hence may result in delayed reporting of other potentially lifethreatening conditions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Firstly, they are best avoided during pregnancy due to the excessive radiation and risk of harming the foetus [26]. In addition, over-scanning patients with suspected COVID-19 can increase the risk of incidental imaging findings and an unnecessary financial burden on the healthcare system [27]. Furthermore, the use of CT-scans for suspected cases is not practical since SARS-CoV-2 has a relatively high transmission rate; each CT machine needs to be sterilised after use, which can waste time and resources as well as overworking the radiology department in times of need and hence may result in delayed reporting of other potentially lifethreatening conditions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The IF on CTAC during SPECT-CT MPI are frequent, but clinically significant ones are relatively infrequent. [3][4][5] The images obtained by low-dose, low resolution CTAC are adequate for the purpose for which they have been acquired (i.e., anatomical correction and artifact attenuation during cardiac MPI), but are not considered to be diagnostic quality. Despite the limitations of its quality, CTAC would detect pulmonary nodules/mass of certain sizes, as well as other abnormalities in the chest when reviewed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, CTAC images often reveal incidental findings (IF); some of them are of clinical significance. [3][4][5] Previously, we reported a series of six cases of lung/hilar malignancy detected by CTAC during SPECT-CT MPI. 6 In that report, a total of 73/1,098 (6.6%) patients were found to have significant IF of the chest that required further evaluation at the time of SPECT-CT MPI and 6/1,098 (0.55%) patients were found to have pulmonary/ hilar malignancy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The inferior resolution renders it difficult to characterize any incidental lesions as does the absence of intravenous contrast. The images are also limited in the anatomic area they cover and more susceptible to artefact compared to standard diagnostic CT. 3 Conversely, a considerable number of incidental findings can be identified on the CT attenuation correction (CTAC) images which may be of clinical significance.…”
Section: Text Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…cause a clinical dilemma with the most recent and largest review counter-intuitively advising against their routine reporting. 3,9 Case Series…”
Section: Text Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%