“…Considerable work has shown that STI prevalence varies by census block group or tract within a city and that the rates are associated with demographic factors such as percentage of African Americans (Becker, et al 1998; Hamers, et al 1995; Hart 1993; Jennings, et al 2005; Lacey, et al 1997; Potterat 1992; Rothenberg & Judson 1983; Zenilman, et al 1988). In addition, multiple studies have found that geographic variation in STI prevalence is associated with various features of the socioeconomic environment, including income, unemployment, and education (Cohen, et al 2000; Ellen, et al 1995; Holtgrave & Crosby 2003; Rice, et al 1991; Rothenberg & Judson 1983), family structure (Kilmarx, et al 1997; Thomas & Gaffield 2003), community physical disorder (Cohen, et al 2000) racial/ethnic composition (Kilmarx, et al 1997; Rice, et al 1991; Rothenberg & Judson 1983; Rothenberg, et al 2007), social capital (Crosby, et al 2002; Holtgrave & Crosby 2003), racial/ethnic income inequalities (Thomas & Gaffield 2003) and racial/ethnic residential segregation (Thomas & Gaffield 2003). These findings, however, only go so far: the association between demographic and socioeconomic factors and STI rates at the ecologic level provides limited insight into individual level STI risk.…”