The Clinical and Radiologic Outcomes of Early Loaded Implants After 5 Years of Service

Kahramanoğlu, Erkut; Aslan, Yılmaz Umut; Özkan, Yaşar; Özkan, Yasemin

doi:10.11607/jomi.7630

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In the present material, a significantly different pattern of marginal bone loss was observed between implants placed with tSFE (showing a median bone loss of 0.3 mm at the distal aspect) and lSFE (showing peri-implant bone stability at the level of the implant shoulder mesially and distally). The magnitude of marginal bone loss observed in tSFE group is highly consistent with that reported at 5 years after placement around either implants of the same manufacturer placed entirely in native bone (0.42 mm, Kahramanoğlu et al, 2020) or different types of implants placed concomitantly with tSFE (0.41 mm, Cannizzaro et al, 2013). Differently, median mMBL and dMBL values observed in our lSFE group at 6 years are not consistent with the average 5-year MBL value (0.72 mm) reported by Cannizzaro et al (2013) for implants placed concomitantly with lSFE.…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 85%

Six‐year extension results of a randomized trial comparing transcrestal and lateral sinus floor elevation at sites with 3–6 mm of residual bone

Farina

Riccardi²,

Schincaglia

et al. 2023

Clinical Oral Implants Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

ObjectivesTo comparatively evaluate the 6‐year outcomes of transcrestal and lateral sinus floor elevation (tSFE and lSFE, respectively).MethodsThe 54 patients representing the per‐protocol population of a randomized trial comparing implant placement with simultaneous tSFE versus lSFE at sites with a residual bone height of 3–6 mm were invited to participate in the 6‐year follow‐up visit. Study assessments included: peri‐implant marginal bone level at the mesial (mMBL) and distal (dMBL) aspects of the implant, proportion of the entire implant surface in direct contact with the radiopaque area (totCON%), probing depth, bleeding on probing, suppuration on probing, and modified plaque index. Also, the conditions of the peri‐implant tissues at 6‐year visit were diagnosed according to the case definitions of peri‐implant health, mucositis, and peri‐implantitis from the 2017 World Workshop.ResultsForty‐three patients (21 treated with tSFE and 22 treated with lSFE) participated in the 6‐year visit. Implant survival was 100%. At 6 years, totCON% was 96% (IR: 88%–100%) in tSFE group and 100% (IR: 98%–100%) in lSFE group (p = .036). No significant intergroup difference in patient distribution according to the diagnosis of peri‐implant health/disease was observed. Median dMBL was 0.3 mm in tSFE group and 0 mm in lSFE group (p = .024).ConclusionsAt 6 years following placement concomitantly with tSFE and lSFE, implants showed similar conditions of peri‐implant health. Peri‐implant bone support was high in both groups and was slightly but significantly lower in tSFE group.

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 85%