2007
DOI: 10.1017/s0950268807009302
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The clinical and public health value of non-culture methods in the investigation of a cluster of unexplained pneumonia cases

Abstract: During 2003, a cluster of initially unexplained pneumonia cases (two fatal) occurred in patients aged <50 years in a British city. Routine culture tests were inconclusive, however, pneumococcal infection was suspected and the putative outbreak was investigated using non-culture methods. Clinical samples from ten patients were tested by pneumococcal polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and multi-locus sequence typing (MLST), or Binax NOW pneumococcal urine antigen test and serotype-specific enzyme-linked immunosorbe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 9 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a paper by Sheppard et al investigating a cluster of initially unexplained pneumonia cases, they describe the identification of a family cluster of cases using exclusively non-culture methods. 59 Although we aimed to identify all published papers describing outbreaks of serious pneumococcal infection, it is possible that there were reports that we did not identify. Also, it is likely that there is significant publication bias as indicated by the small number of countries from which the reports emanate.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a paper by Sheppard et al investigating a cluster of initially unexplained pneumonia cases, they describe the identification of a family cluster of cases using exclusively non-culture methods. 59 Although we aimed to identify all published papers describing outbreaks of serious pneumococcal infection, it is possible that there were reports that we did not identify. Also, it is likely that there is significant publication bias as indicated by the small number of countries from which the reports emanate.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%